Your Cart

Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd [1973]

Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd [1973] AC 360 is a significant UK company law case that deals with the rights of minority shareholders in a closely held company. The case established the concept of a quasi-partnership and clarified the circumstances under which a minority shareholder could seek a winding-up order of the company on the grounds that it is just and equitable to do so.


The case involved Ebrahimi and Nazar, who were originally business partners involved in buying and selling expensive rugs. They later decided to incorporate their business and became the sole shareholders of the company. A few years later, when Nazar's son came of age, he was appointed to the board of directors and Ebrahimi and Nazar both transferred shares to him. However, their relationship soured over time, and a dispute arose between them. After a falling out between the directors, Nazar and son called a company meeting and passed an ordinary resolution to remove Ebrahimi as a director. Ebrahimi applied to the court for a remedy to have the company wound up.


The House of Lords recognised that while a company is a separate legal entity, there are situations where it can be treated as a quasi-partnership. In this case, the company's operations closely resembled those of a partnership, and the personal relationships and mutual confidence of the parties played a significant role.


Ebrahimi had a legitimate expectation that his management role in the company would continue and that the articles of association would not be used against him to force him out. The court considered it inequitable for Nazar and his son to use their legal rights to oust Ebrahimi.


The House of Lords held that it was just and equitable to wind up the company in this case. This decision was based on the unique circumstances, including the personal relationship between the parties, mutual expectations, and the fact that the company's structure and operations resembled a partnership.


The case expanded the application of the just and equitable provision under company law. It emphasised that the provision could be used to subject the exercise of legal rights to equitable considerations, particularly when the company's structure involves personal relationships, mutual confidence, and restrictions on share transfers:


  1. an association formed or continued on the basis of a personal relationship, involving mutual confidence – this element will often be found where a pre-existing partnership has been converted into a limited company;
  2. an agreement, or understanding, that all, or some (for there may be ‘sleeping’ members), of the shareholders shall participate in the conduct of the business;
  3. restriction upon the transfer of the members’ interest in the company – so that if confidence is lost, or one member is removed from management, he cannot take out his stake and go elsewhere.


The Court suggested that cases of quasi-partnership typically may include one, or probably more, of these elements. The Court also recognised that a company, especially a closely held or family-owned company, is more than just a legal entity. It acknowledged that individuals within the company have rights, expectations, and obligations among themselves, and these personal relationships should be taken into account when considering the winding up of a company.


Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd is an important case that highlights the court's willingness to consider equitable principles and individual rights when deciding whether to order the winding up of a company, particularly in the context of closely held companies with quasi-partnership characteristics.


You can learn more about this topic with our Company Law notes.


Subscribe to UOL Case Bank for more exclusive content and case summaries.

Trusted by thousands of law students worldwide

Where are our students from?

Yale University

Council of Europe

Baker Mckenzie 

University of Chicago

Columbia University

New York University

University of Michigan 

INSEAD

University College London (UCL)

London School of Economics (LSE)

King’s College London (KCL)

University of London

University of Manchester

University of Zurich

University of York

Brandeis University

University of Exeter

University of Sheffield

Boston University

University of Washington

University of Leeds

University of Law

Royal Holloway, University of London 

Birkbeck, University of London

SOAS, University of London

University of Kent

University of Hull

Queen’s University Belfast

Toronto Metropolitan University

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

University of Buckingham

Your perfect companion for open-book and closed-book exams

Diagrams and Charts

Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

Clear and Succinct Definitions

Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

Statutory Provisions

Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

Case Summaries

We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

Rules and Exceptions

Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

Terminology

Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

Case Law

Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

Law Essay Guide

You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

Problem Question Guide

We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

Structured Explanations

Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

Legal Research

You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

Exam-focused

All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.