Your Cart
R v Blaue (1975) | Criminal Law

R v Blaue (1975) | Criminal Law

R v Blaue (1975) 61 Cr App R 271 is a leading case in English criminal law that deals with the issue of causation in cases of manslaughter, specifically in relation to the defence of provocation.

In this case, the defendant, Blaue, stabbed a woman multiple times after she had refused his advances. The victim, who was a Jehovah's Witness, refused a blood transfusion on religious grounds, which would have saved her life. She died as a result of her injuries.

At trial, the defence argued that Blaue was provoked by the victim's refusal to have sexual intercourse with him and that this was a partial defence to murder. The defence argued that the victim's refusal of a blood transfusion was an intervening act that broke the chain of causation between the defendant's actions and the victim's death.

The court held that the victim's refusal of a blood transfusion did not break the chain of causation and that Blaue was guilty of manslaughter. The court stated that a defendant must take the victim as they find them and that the victim's refusal of a blood transfusion was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's actions. Furthermore, the court held that the defendant's subjective reaction to the victim's provocation was irrelevant, as the objective test for provocation required consideration of whether a reasonable person would have been provoked.

The case is significant because it established that the thin skull rule applies to cases of manslaughter and that the defendant cannot rely on the victim's refusal of medical treatment as a defence. The case also clarified the objective test for the defence of provocation and emphasised that the defendant's subjective reaction to provocation is irrelevant.

The thin skull rule, also known as the eggshell skull rule, is a legal doctrine that holds a defendant responsible for the full extent of the harm caused to a victim, even if the victim has a pre-existing medical condition or vulnerability that makes them more susceptible to injury, as in Smith v Leech Brain & Co (1962). In other words, a defendant must take a victim as they find them, and cannot use the victim's pre-existing condition as a defence to limit their liability.

The rule is called the thin skull rule because it was used in cases where a victim's skull or brain was particularly vulnerable to injury due to a pre-existing condition such as a thin skull, which might increase the risk of harm from a head injury. However, the rule is not limited to cases involving head injuries or medical conditions affecting the skull. It can apply to any pre-existing condition that makes a victim more susceptible to injury or harm.

The thin skull rule is often applied in cases of negligence, personal injury, and criminal law, particularly in cases of assault or battery where a victim's pre-existing condition may make them more vulnerable to harm. The rule serves to protect vulnerable individuals and ensure that defendants are held accountable for the full extent of the harm they cause, regardless of the victim's pre-existing condition or vulnerability.

You can learn more about this topic and other case law with our Criminal Law and Tort Law notes.

Featured Collection

UOLLB Features

UOLLB First Class Law Notes

Diagrams and Charts

Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

Clear and Succinct Definitions

Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

Statutory Provisions

Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

Case Summaries

We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

Rules and Exceptions

Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.


Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

Case Law

Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

Law Essay Guide

You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

Problem Question Guide

We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

Structured Explanations

Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

Legal Research

You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.


All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.