Your Cart

R (Corner House Research) v Director of Serious Fraud Office 2008

R (Corner House Research) v Director of Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60 revolved around the Serious Fraud Office's (SFO) decision to terminate an investigation into alleged bribery involving BAE Systems, a major defence contractor, and the Saudi Arabian government. The investigation pertained to suspected corruption in connection with the Al-Yamamah arms deal, a significant arms contract between BAE Systems and Saudi Arabia.

Corner House Research, an NGO involved in anti-corruption efforts, challenged the SFO's decision through judicial review, arguing that it violated the rule of law. The Divisional Court, consisting of Moses LJ and Sullivan J, ruled in favour of Corner House Research, asserting that the decision to halt the investigation constituted a breach of the rule of law.

However, the House of Lords, in its judgment, took a different stance. Lord Bingham, delivering the leading opinion, emphasised the seriousness of the potential consequences if the investigation were to proceed in defiance of the Saudi Arabian government's threats. He drew parallels with previous instances where British authorities had yielded to foreign pressure to safeguard lives, highlighting the complexity of the decision-making process.

Baroness Hale acknowledged the distasteful nature of succumbing to external threats but ultimately concurred with the House's decision. She recognised the Director's dilemma in balancing competing interests, including the imperative to uphold the rule of law and the duty to protect British lives.

Lord Brown, in his concurring opinion, underscored the Director's conscientious consideration of the implications for the rule of law before reaching his decision. He noted the Director's reluctance to suspend the investigation but acknowledged the reality of the threat posed by Saudi Arabia.

In conclusion, while the Divisional Court found the SFO's decision to be in breach of the rule of law, the House of Lords, upon careful consideration of the circumstances and potential consequences, deemed the decision lawful. This case underscores the nuanced and complex nature of upholding the rule of law in the face of external pressures and competing interests.

Check out our exam-focused Public Law notes now.

Subscribe to UOL Case Bank for more exclusive content and case summaries.

Featured Collection

UOLLB Features

UOLLB First Class Law Notes

Diagrams and Charts

Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

Clear and Succinct Definitions

Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

Statutory Provisions

Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

Case Summaries

We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

Rules and Exceptions

Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.


Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

Case Law

Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

Law Essay Guide

You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

Problem Question Guide

We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

Structured Explanations

Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

Legal Research

You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.


All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.