The Mischief Rule is a principle of statutory interpretation that requires judges to interpret a statute in a way that is consistent with the legislature's intent, as determined by identifying the "mischief" or problem that the statute was designed to address. While the Mischief Rule can be helpful in determining the purpose of a statute, it also has both pros and cons.
Advantages
Consistent with legislative intent: The Mischief Rule seeks to identify the legislature's intent in enacting the statute, and therefore can lead to an interpretation that is consistent with that intent.
Flexible: The Mischief Rule allows judges to depart from a literal interpretation of the statute's words in order to achieve the purpose of the statute.
Adaptable to changing circumstances: The Mischief Rule can be used to adapt the meaning of a statute to changing circumstances, ensuring that the statute continues to serve its intended purpose.
Disadvantages
Can be subjective: The identification of the "mischief" or problem that the statute was designed to address can be subjective, and different judges may reach different conclusions about what that problem is.
Can lead to uncertainty: The use of the Mischief Rule can create uncertainty for individuals and businesses who must comply with the statute, as they may not know how a court will interpret the statute in a given case.
Can be manipulated: The Mischief Rule can be manipulated to achieve a desired outcome, as a judge could identify a different "mischief" or problem in order to support a particular interpretation of the statute.
Study with us to smash your AL/AS Law exam now:
