The criminal justice system is a vital part of any democratic society, and the use of juries in criminal courts is one of the most important features of this system. Juries are made up of ordinary citizens who are selected from the local community and who are responsible for deciding whether a defendant is guilty or not guilty based on the evidence presented in court.
Advantages
The use of juries in criminal courts is seen as a way to ensure that justice is being served in a fair and impartial manner. Juries are made up of ordinary citizens who are chosen from the community, which is believed to provide a more balanced perspective on the case.
Juries help to maintain public trust in the legal system. By involving ordinary citizens in the administration of justice, it is believed that the legal system is more transparent and accountable.
The use of juries can help to ensure that verdicts are based on the facts presented in court. Juries are instructed to consider only the evidence presented in court and to disregard any outside influences or opinions they may have.
The use of juries provides a level of protection against potential abuse of power by the state. By involving ordinary citizens in the decision-making process, it is believed that the risk of wrongful convictions or other abuses of power is reduced.
Disadvantages
The use of juries can be expensive and time-consuming. Jury trials are often longer and more complex than trials heard by a judge alone, which can result in higher costs and longer waiting times for cases to be heard.
Juries may be biased or influenced by outside factors. Despite being instructed to consider only the evidence presented in court, jurors may be influenced by media coverage of the case, their own personal beliefs, or other external factors.
Jurors may not have the necessary expertise to understand complex legal issues or evidence. Jurors are not legal experts and may struggle to understand complex legal arguments or technical evidence.
There is a risk of jury nullification, where jurors may decide to acquit a defendant even if the evidence suggests otherwise. This can occur when jurors believe that the law or the punishment is unjust or overly harsh.
While there are advantages and disadvantages to using juries in criminal courts, their use is seen as a fundamental feature of the democratic legal system in many countries. The potential benefits of involving ordinary citizens in the administration of justice are believed to outweigh the potential drawbacks, and juries remain an important part of the criminal justice system in many countries.
Study with us to smash your AL/AS Law exam now:
