Your Cart

Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948]

Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223, often referred to as the Wednesbury case, is a landmark decision in English administrative law that set a standard for the review of administrative decisions based on irrationality or unreasonableness. The case was heard by the English Court of Appeal in 1947 and later by the House of Lords in 1948. The judgment established the principle of Wednesbury unreasonableness as a ground for judicial review.


The case involved a cinema company, Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd (APPH), challenging a decision made by Wednesbury Corporation (now the Metropolitan Borough of Walsall) to grant a licence for cinema performances on Sundays but with restrictive conditions. APPH argued that the conditions imposed by the Corporation were so unreasonable that they amounted to an abuse of power.


The House of Lords ruled in favour of Wednesbury Corporation and found that the Corporation's decision was not unreasonable to the extent that no reasonable authority could have made such a decision. The Court clarified that for any remedies to be granted against decisions of public bodies, it would have to find that the decision-maker:


  • had given undue relevance to facts that in reality lacked the relevance for being considered in the decision-making process.
  • had not given relevance to facts that were relevant and worthy of being considered in the decision-making process
  • had made a decision that was completely absurd, a decision so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could have possibly made it.


The House of Lords stated that a decision would be considered irrational or unreasonable (Wednesbury unreasonableness) if it is so unreasonable that no reasonable person or authority could have arrived at it. This means that if a decision is within the range of reasonable choices that a reasonable authority could have made, the court would not interfere with it, even if the court would have made a different decision.


The Wednesbury case established the Wednesbury principle as a cornerstone of judicial review in the UK. It set a high threshold for proving unreasonableness, acknowledging that administrative bodies have discretionary powers, and the courts should be cautious in substituting their own judgment for that of the decision-makers. The case remains a leading authority in administrative law, guiding courts in their review of administrative decisions based on the ground of irrationality or unreasonableness.


You can learn more about this topic with our Public Law, Constitutional Law and Administrative Law notes.


Subscribe to UOL Case Bank for more exclusive content and case summaries.

Trusted by thousands of law students worldwide

Where are our students from?

Yale University

Council of Europe

Baker Mckenzie 

University of Chicago

Columbia University

New York University

University of Michigan 

INSEAD

University College London (UCL)

London School of Economics (LSE)

King’s College London (KCL)

University of London

University of Manchester

University of Zurich

University of York

Brandeis University

University of Exeter

University of Sheffield

Boston University

University of Washington

University of Leeds

University of Law

Royal Holloway, University of London 

Birkbeck, University of London

SOAS, University of London

University of Kent

University of Hull

Queen’s University Belfast

Toronto Metropolitan University

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

University of Buckingham

Your perfect companion for open-book and closed-book exams

Diagrams and Charts

Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

Clear and Succinct Definitions

Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

Statutory Provisions

Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

Case Summaries

We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

Rules and Exceptions

Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

Terminology

Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

Case Law

Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

Law Essay Guide

You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

Problem Question Guide

We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

Structured Explanations

Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

Legal Research

You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

Exam-focused

All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.