Your Cart

Clinton v Jones [1997]

Clinton v Jones [1997] 520 US 681 is a landmark ruling that unequivocally declared that a sitting President is not immune from civil litigation for acts done before taking office and unrelated to the office. This decision represented a significant moment in US legal history, reinforcing the principle that no one, not even the President, is above the law.

The origins of the case trace back to a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones, a former Arkansas state employee, against President Bill Clinton. Jones alleged that Clinton, while serving as Governor of Arkansas, made unwanted sexual advances towards her. The lawsuit was initiated after allegations surfaced in a magazine article, leading to Jones seeking civil damages. Clinton's defence argued for presidential immunity, positing that a sitting President should not be distracted by lawsuits unrelated to their official duties. This argument was initially upheld, granting Clinton temporary immunity and delaying the case.

However, the unanimous Supreme Court decision overturned this reasoning, stating that the Constitution does not grant a sitting President immunity from civil law litigation in federal courts for actions taken before their presidency and unrelated to the office. The Court's rationale was grounded in the principles of separation of powers and equality before the law, affirming that the judiciary has the authority to hear such cases without unduly interfering with executive functions.

The ruling had profound implications, not just for Clinton, but for the presidency itself. It underscored the accountability of the President to the judiciary for personal actions taken before and potentially during their term, outside of official duties. The decision led directly to the deposition of Clinton in the Jones lawsuit, which subsequently uncovered the Lewinsky scandal. This scandal, in turn, led to impeachment proceedings against Clinton, highlighting the potent repercussions of the Court's ruling.

Furthermore, the case set a precedent for the treatment of future Presidents, emphasising that the office does not provide a shield against personal legal responsibilities. The detailed examination of Clinton's conduct and the subsequent sanctions, including a suspension of his law license and fines, illustrated the legal vulnerabilities of sitting Presidents to past actions.

This case is a pivotal moment in the legal narrative of presidential powers and responsibilities, demonstrating the judiciary's role in maintaining the balance between the branches of government and ensuring that all individuals, regardless of position, are accountable under the law.

Trusted by thousands of law students worldwide

Where are our students from?

Yale University

Council of Europe

Baker Mckenzie 

University of Chicago

Columbia University

New York University

University of Michigan 


University College London (UCL)

London School of Economics (LSE)

King’s College London (KCL)

University of London

University of Manchester

University of Zurich

University of York

Brandeis University

University of Exeter

University of Sheffield

Boston University

University of Washington

University of Leeds

University of Law

Royal Holloway, University of London 

Birkbeck, University of London

SOAS, University of London

University of Kent

University of Hull

Queen’s University Belfast

Toronto Metropolitan University

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Your perfect companion for open-book and closed-book exams

Diagrams and Charts

Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

Clear and Succinct Definitions

Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

Statutory Provisions

Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

Case Summaries

We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

Rules and Exceptions

Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.


Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

Case Law

Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

Law Essay Guide

You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

Problem Question Guide

We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

Structured Explanations

Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

Legal Research

You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.


All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.