A v United Kingdom [2002]

In A v United Kingdom [2003] 36 EHRR 51, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) examined the compatibility of Parliamentary privilege with the rights guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), particularly focusing on the right to a fair hearing under Article 6 of the ECHR. The central issue before the ECHR was whether Parliamentary privilege, as exercised in this case, violated the individual's right to a fair hearing and their right to private life under the ECHR.

The applicant in this case lived in social housing provided by a housing association and faced racial abuse. She was relocated to another residence, but in 1996, the Member of Parliament (MP) for the area initiated a parliamentary debate on municipal housing policies. During the debate, the MP referred to the applicant multiple times, labelling her as a "neighbour from hell" and accusing her of criminal activities. The applicant denied the allegations, and the MP did not attempt to communicate with her or verify the accuracy of his comments. The media further publicised the accusations, leading to hate letters and public abuse against the applicant.

The ECtHR held that restrictions on Convention rights, including Articles 6 could be justified by the need to protect free speech in Parliament, as embodied in the principle of Parliamentary privilege. Judge Costa reaffirmed the absolute nature of the immunity enjoyed by MPs regarding their statements, emphasising that this immunity serves an important interest justifying the denial of access to court for seeking redress. Despite the serious interference with the applicant's private and family life resulting from the MP's speech, the ECtHR concluded that the rights under Article 6 and Article 8 of the ECHR were not infringed.

The case raises concerns about the lack of redress for an applicant suffering defamation from a Member of Parliament, regardless of the severity of the allegations and their impact on the individual's life. It suggests that defamatory statements may not be opinions protected by parliamentary immunity but rather misinformation.

The judgment also contemplates whether parliamentary privilege needs to extend to the press, citing the example of the French government where immunity applies only in the course of their duty. Furthermore, the dissenting opinion of Judge Loucaides argues that the complete lack of remedy for the applicant, despite the damages suffered, could amount to a violation of Article 13 of the ECHR.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.