Ailsa Craig Fishing Co Ltd v Malvern Fishing Co Ltd [1983]

Ailsa Craig Fishing Co Ltd v Malvern Fishing Co Ltd [1983] 1 WLR 164 dealt with a situation where Ailsa Craig Fishing had hired a security firm to supervise their fishing vessel. Unfortunately, due to the security firm's negligence, one of Malvern Fishing's boats sank, leading to a successful lawsuit by Malvern against Ailsa for £55,000. Ailsa then sought an indemnity from the security firm for these damages.

However, the contract between Ailsa and the security firm included a limitation clause that capped the firm's liability in most circumstances to £1000. The clause specified that if any liability arose for loss or damage related to the provision or failure of the services covered by the contract, the liability would be limited to £1000.

Ailsa argued that the 3-stage test for interpreting exclusion clauses in negligence cases should be applied to the limitation clause. They contended that if interpreted through this test, the limitation clause would not apply in this specific situation, allowing them to recover the full amount from the security firm.

The central issue before the House of Lords was how limitation clauses should be interpreted. The House of Lords rejected Ailsa's argument, holding that the normal principles of contractual interpretation should be applied to construe the limitation clause. The clause was deemed to apply to the facts of the case.

The decision in this case establishes that the interpretation of limitation clauses is to be determined using the standard rules for construing contracts. Unlike clauses that entirely exclude liability for negligence, limitation clauses are not subject to more stringent rules. The court emphasised that the clause should be construed by considering the entirety of the contract.

Additionally, the case includes discussions about the contra proferentem rule, a principle used in the interpretation of exclusion and limitation clauses. However, it is noted that the Supreme Court significantly limited the application of the contra proferentem rule in the case of BNY Mellon Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v LBG Capital (No 1) Plc [2016].
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.