Allcard v Skinner [1887]

Allcard v Skinner [1887] 36 Ch D 145 addressed the issue of undue influence within the context of a relationship between Miss Allcard and Miss Skinner, a lady superior of a Protestant religious order known as the Sisters of the Poor.

Miss Allcard was introduced to Miss Skinner by the Reverend Mr Nihill, and shortly thereafter, Miss Allcard became a member of the religious order. The order required members to adhere to vows of poverty and obedience. Merely three days after joining, Miss Allcard executed a will bequeathing all her property to Miss Skinner. Additionally, she transferred railway stock that came into her possession in 1872 and 1874 to Miss Skinner. After leaving the sisterhood, Miss Allcard sought to reclaim the money she had given.

Lindley LJ delivered the judgment, stating that Miss Allcard was unduly influenced but was barred by laches from obtaining restitution. Laches refers to an unreasonable delay in pursuing a legal remedy, and in this case, it played a role in limiting Miss Allcard's ability to seek restitution. Even if restitution were possible, it would only have been for the portion of the gift that remained in Miss Skinner's possession after being spent in accordance with Miss Allcard's wishes.

Lord Lindley articulated the principle underlying the doctrine of undue influence. He posited two possible principles: one focused on saving individuals from the consequences of their own folly, while the other aimed to protect them from being victimised by others. In Lord Lindley's view, the doctrine of undue influence is rooted in the latter principle. Courts of Equity, he argued, do not set aside gifts based on the donor's folly or imprudence. The courts repudiate any jurisdiction that encourages the reclaiming of property disposed of foolishly. However, the doctrine of undue influence is legitimate in protecting individuals from being coerced, tricked, or misled by others into parting with their property.

Cotton LJ added further clarification, identifying two scenarios where undue influence might be established: first, when the court is satisfied that the gift resulted from express influence used by the donee; and second, when the relations between the donor and donee raise a presumption that the donee had influence over the donor, particularly at or around the time of the gift's execution. The case illustrates the court's careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding the gift and the nature of the relationship between the parties in determining whether undue influence was at play.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.