Bagum v Hafiz [2016]

In Bagum v Hafiz and another [2016] Ch 421, the court's discretionary powers in relation to co-ownership in trusts of land were central to the legal proceedings. The case involved a mother and her two eldest sons who jointly purchased and occupied a home in Islington. They registered as tenants in common with their beneficial interests divided into three equal shares. Disputes arose regarding the use of the family home, leading one son to leave and request the other son to purchase his one-third beneficial interest. The son sought an order to that effect under Section 14 of the Trusts of Land and Appointments of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA).

At the first instance, the court declared that it had no jurisdiction to make the requested order. Instead, it ordered the property to be sold on the open market, with the liberty for the parties to bid for its purchase. The key issues revolved around the exercise of the court's discretionary powers concerning co-ownership and trusts of land, particularly when the beneficiaries did not unanimously consent to a particular course of action under Section 14 of TOLATA.

The court held that Section 14 of TOLATA provides it with the widest discretion to make orders relating to the exercise by the trustees of any of their functions. This discretion is based on broad considerations, with the court's functions aimed at relieving the trustees from the requirement of unanimous consent and ensuring just treatment of the property. In light of these considerations, the court made two important determinations.

Firstly, the court clarified that it lacked jurisdiction to direct one beneficiary under a trust of land to sell their beneficial interest to another beneficiary. Secondly, the court affirmed that the first instance judge had the authority under Section 14(2)(a) to exercise a wide discretion, contrary to the unanimous consent of the beneficiaries. The judge considered factors such as the intentions and purpose of the trust (providing a family home), the circumstances of occupation, and ensuring that a beneficiary obtains proper value for their beneficial interest. Consequently, the judge had the power to order the sale of the property on the open market to obtain the best price.

In essence, the court's decision upheld the wide-ranging discretionary powers granted by Section 14 of TOLATA, emphasising the court's role in considering various factors to ensure fair and just treatment in co-ownership situations involving trusts of land.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.