Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer [2001]

Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer [2001] EWCA Civ 274 revolves around the application of promissory estoppel in the context of a long-standing commercial relationship between Baird Textile Holdings Ltd and Marks & Spencer.

Baird Textile had been a supplier of garments to Marks & Spence for an extensive period of 30 years without a formal written agreement. Marks & Spence gave notice that they would cease purchasing garments from Baird Textile at the end of the season. In response, Baird Textile sued Marks & Spence on two alternate grounds: (1) alleging that Marks & Spence was in breach of an implied contract requiring a longer notice period, and (2) even in the absence of a contract, arguing that Marks & Spence was estopped from terminating the relationship abruptly, citing the precedent set by Walton Stores v Maher [1988].

The court rejected both grounds of Baird Textile's argument, leading to the failure of the claim. Mance LJ, delivering the judgment, emphasised the need to distinguish between different types of estoppels. He also emphasised the importance of keeping different estoppels distinct and adhering to precedent regarding their scope. The flexibility of the estoppel doctrine allows it to take different shapes based on the specific context and legal field.

Mance LJ clarified that while proprietary estoppel is a cause of action, it is limited to specific circumstances, particularly those involving an interest in land. Mance LJ highlighted that promissory estoppel is not a standalone cause of action. Instead, it can assist in bringing about a cause of action, as outlined in Amalgamated Investments by Brandon LJ. Both estoppels—promissory and conventional—require a pre-existing contractual relationship between the parties. Mance LJ argued that this requirement is not bypassed by limiting relief to reliance loss.

In conclusion, the court held that while promissory estoppel is not a cause of action by itself, it may play a supporting role in the context of an existing contractual relationship, as outlined in the judgment of Brandon LJ in Amalgamated Investments. The case underscores the importance of distinguishing between different estoppels and adhering to established legal principles in their application.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.