Basic Dichotomies on Nature and Scope of Criminology

The nature and scope of criminology involve various dichotomies and controversies, reflecting the diverse perspectives and debates within the field. Here are some basic dichotomies that arise in the study of criminology:

Classical vs positivist perspectives: One fundamental dichotomy in criminology is the contrast between classical and positivist perspectives. Classical criminology emphasises free will, rationality, and individual choice as the primary factors influencing criminal behaviour. Positivist criminology, on the other hand, focuses on scientific methods and the idea that criminal behaviour is determined by biological, psychological, and sociological factors.

Individual-level vs structural explanations: Another significant dichotomy is the tension between individual-level and structural explanations of crime. Individual-level theories emphasise personal characteristics, such as personality traits or psychological factors, as the key determinants of criminal behaviour. In contrast, structural theories emphasise social, economic, and environmental factors, such as poverty, inequality, and social disorganisation, as root causes of crime.

Legalistic vs critical perspectives: Criminology also faces debates between legalistic and critical perspectives. Legalistic criminology focuses on the study of criminal law, legal institutions, and the functioning of the criminal justice system. Critical criminology, on the other hand, takes a more sociopolitical approach, examining power structures, social inequalities, and how the criminal justice system may perpetuate social control and oppression.

Punishment vs rehabilitation: The debate between punishment and rehabilitation strategies is another ongoing controversy in criminology. Some argue for punitive measures as a deterrent and retributive response to crime, while others advocate for rehabilitation, emphasising the importance of addressing underlying causes of criminal behaviour and reintegrating offenders back into society.

Crime control vs due process: The tension between crime control and due process is a longstanding controversy in criminology. Crime control advocates prioritise efficient and swift responses to crime, often emphasising law enforcement and preventive measures. Due process proponents, on the other hand, emphasise the protection of individual rights, fair procedures, and the presumption of innocence in the criminal justice system.

Quantitative vs qualitative research: Criminology also experiences debates regarding research methods. Quantitative research relies on numerical data and statistical analysis to explore crime patterns and test hypotheses. Qualitative research, on the other hand, focuses on in-depth understanding through methods such as interviews, observations, and case studies, often exploring the subjective experiences and meanings associated with crime.

These dichotomies or controversies contribute to the richness and complexity of criminology as a field of study. They reflect diverse perspectives and ongoing debates about the nature, causes, and responses to crime, offering different lenses through which scholars and practitioners approach the understanding and management of criminal behaviour.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.