Biscoe and Baxter v Milner [2021]

Biscoe and Baxter v Milner [2021] EWHC 763 (Ch) examined the impact of a settlement agreement between liquidators and certain respondents on the continuation of claims against other respondents in the context of an alleged fraudulent investment scheme.

Equitable Law Capital (ELC) collapsed, leading to insolvency proceedings. The joint liquidators, Biscoe and Baxter, sought various orders against respondents involved in the scheme. Claims included dishonest assistance, knowing receipt, conspiracy, transactions at an undervalue, and wrongful trading. Before the trial, claims against the Milners were settled for £190,000.

The Settlement Agreement stated the settlement amount as "full and final settlement of the claims". The claims included those against the Milners detailed in the Application Notice. Clauses 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 required the Milners to provide information and evidence concerning the third respondent. Clause 5.1 contained an "Agreement not to sue", barring actions concerning the claims.

The liquidators argued that the Settlement Agreement didn't affect claims against other respondents. They emphasised the common law rule on joint tortfeasors and highlighted clauses implying continued pursuit of claims against the remaining respondents.

The Milners contended that the Settlement Agreement barred remaining claims. They asserted the release of liability, emphasised the agreement not to sue, and argued against implied terms for pursuing other respondents.

The High Court ruled in favour of the liquidators. The judge considered the common law rule regarding joint tortfeasors but found clauses 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 to be powerful indicators of the intention to continue claims. The court emphasised the context, including the means-based settlement and the small proportion of the settlement amount compared to total claims. A term was implied, allowing the liquidators to pursue all claims against the remaining respondents.

The judgment highlights the possibility of implying terms into settlement agreements regarding the continuation of claims, especially in scenarios involving joint and concurrent tortfeasors. The court will consider surrounding circumstances, including settlement amount and means-based settlement, in determining the agreement's scope. As clear clauses addressing the continuation of claims against other parties can be powerful factors in assessing the parties' intentions, settlement agreements should be carefully drafted to explicitly state the impact on claims not covered by the settlement, avoiding ambiguities and potential disputes.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.