Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Company [1856]

Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Company [1856] 11 Ex Ch 781 is a seminal one in the law of negligence, known for its definitive articulation of what constitutes negligence and the standard of care required. This case provides a foundational understanding of the principle of reasonableness in determining whether a party has acted negligently. The facts and judgment of this case offer critical insights into how the courts assess breaches of duty and the foreseeability of risks in negligence claims.

The Birmingham Waterworks Company, incorporated by statute to supply water to Birmingham, was required by law to maintain and install fireplugs in streets where main pipes were laid. According to the statute, these fireplugs were to be kept functional and properly maintained, with specific instructions for their placement and upkeep. The fireplug opposite Mr. Blyth's house was installed in accordance with the statutory requirements and was constructed with sound materials. However, during an unusually severe frost, the fireplug failed, leading to a flood that damaged Mr. Blyth's property. Blyth subsequently sued the Waterworks Company for negligence, arguing that their failure to prevent the frost-related failure of the fireplug constituted a breach of their duty of care.

In this landmark decision, Baron Alderson articulated a classic definition of negligence:

Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do. The defendants might have been liable for negligence, if, unintentionally, they omitted to do that which a reasonable person would have done, or did that which a person taking reasonable precautions would not have done.

This definition established that negligence involves either failing to act as a reasonable person would in the given circumstances or doing something that a reasonable person would avoid. This definition also emphasised that negligence is judged based on what a prudent and reasonable individual would do, considering the circumstances.

The court found that the severe frost was an unforeseeable event, given Birmingham's historical climate. Since such extreme cold was not anticipated, it was deemed unreasonable to expect the Waterworks Company to have foreseen and mitigated this specific risk. Therefore, the company was not held liable for negligence as it was not foreseeable that the frost would cause such a failure.

Justice Martin concurred with this reasoning, asserting that imposing liability under these circumstances would essentially require the Waterworks Company to act as an insurer against all possible risks, which was not the intent of the statutory requirements.

Justice Bramwell, while dissenting on some legal principles, agreed with the result based on the facts of the case. The judgment ultimately reinforced the principle that liability in negligence requires both a breach of a reasonable standard of care and the foreseeability of the risk that led to the harm.

Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get fully prepared for SQE1 without breaking the bank. Access cost-effective SQE study manuals and 2000 practice questions developed by UOLLB, edited by lawyers, and published by UOL Press.

Turbocharge SQE Performance
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain access to over 2,200 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is approved by UOL School of Law and is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Join students and legal professionals from Legal 500 firms, top universities and international organisations who trust UOLLB

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Ministry of Defence
Baker Mckenzie
Linklaters
Atsumi & Sakai
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Arizona State University
McGill University
Toronto Metropolitan University
University of Hong Kong (HKU)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)
University of Buckingham
Robert Gordon University
ESSEC Business School
University of Puerto Rico

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Skills

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.