British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Co of London Ltd [1912]

British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Co of London Ltd [1912]

British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Co of London Ltd [1912] AC 673 is a significant English contract law case that delves into the duty of parties to mitigate losses following a breach of contract.

The defendants, British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd, supplied turbines to the plaintiffs, Underground Electric Railways Co of London Ltd. However, these turbines were deficient in power, constituting a breach of the contract. Despite the breach, the plaintiffs accepted and used the turbines but expressly reserved their right to claim damages. Subsequently, the plaintiffs replaced the deficient turbines with others that were significantly more efficient than the ones supplied by the defendants, even if those had met the contract specifications. The plaintiffs sought to recover the cost of the substitute turbines as damages.

The House of Lords, in rendering judgment, established a crucial principle in assessing damages for a breach of contract. It held that any loss suffered by the plaintiffs had to be weighed against any gains directly resulting from their efforts to mitigate the consequences of the breach. While the plaintiffs were not obligated to purchase the new turbines, the consequential gains in profits and saved expenses resulting from this decision needed to be taken into account. In this case, the savings exceeded the cost of the substitute turbines, leading to the conclusion that the plaintiffs recovered nothing under this particular head of damages.

Viscount Haldane LC, delivering the leading judgment, emphasised that the determination of the quantum of damages is a question of fact. He outlined two fundamental principles to guide the assessment of damages. The first principle aimed to place the innocent party, who had proven a breach of contract, in as good a financial position as if the contract had been performed. However, this principle was qualified by a second one, which imposed a duty on the plaintiff to take all reasonable steps to mitigate the loss resulting from the breach. Neglecting to take such reasonable steps would preclude the plaintiff from claiming damages for that portion of the loss.

Importantly, Viscount Haldane clarified that the duty to mitigate does not compel a party to take steps beyond what a reasonable and prudent person would ordinarily take in the course of their business. The emphasis lies on actions that are reasonable in the given circumstances.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.