C-26/62 Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen [1963]

C-26/62 Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen [1963]

C-26/62 Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen [1963] ECR 1 is a landmark case decided by the European Court of Justice in 1963, laying the foundation for the principle of direct effect in European Union law. This principle established that provisions of the Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community could create legal rights enforceable by both natural and legal persons before the courts of the Community's member states.

The case originated from the reclassification of a chemical by the Benelux countries, resulting in higher customs charges. Van Gend en Loos, a postal and transportation company, contested the charges, arguing a violation of Article 12 of the Treaty of Rome. This article prohibited member states from introducing new customs duties or charges having equivalent effect. Van Gend en Loos paid the tariff but sought to retrieve the money, leading to a dispute with the Dutch Tax Authority.

The Dutch Tariefcommissie sought a preliminary ruling from the European Court of Justice, inquiring whether Article 12 conferred rights on nationals that could be enforced in national courts. Advocate General Roemer opined against direct effect, asserting that citizens could not rely on Article 12. However, the Court departed from this opinion, asserting that Van Gend en Loos had the right to recover the paid tariff.

The Court held that Article 12 could create personal rights for individuals, even if not expressly stated. The principle of direct effect was established, allowing citizens to enforce their rights in national courts. The judgment emphasised that the Community constituted a new legal order with obligations and rights for both member states and their nationals.

The Court justified direct effect based on the clear and unconditional nature of Article 12, creating a negative obligation that was not dependent on national legislation. The autonomy of the EU legal order was emphasised, allowing EU law to create effects in national legal orders independently. The decision reflected the Court's creative jurisprudence and its commitment to ensuring member states' compliance with treaty obligations.

The case introduced a significant enforcement mechanism at the national level, as direct effect did not necessitate the Commission to bring an action against the state. This distributed enforcement mechanism empowered individuals to act as enforcers in national courts, providing more effective legal protection.

Van Gend en Loos is recognised as one of the most important developments in EU law, highlighting the Court's role in shaping the legal framework of the European Union. The case set a precedent for the direct effect doctrine, demonstrating the Court's proactive approach in safeguarding fundamental principles and ensuring the effectiveness of EU law in member states.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.