C-614/14 Atanas Ognyanov v Sofiyska [2016]

C-614/14 Atanas Ognyanov v Sofiyska [2016] is a notable EU law case establishing that procedural rules of member states cannot bar the preliminary reference procedure which enables national courts of member states to seek guidance from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the interpretation and application of EU law.

A Bulgarian court initiated a preliminary reference to the CJEU in a criminal case. According to EU Rules of Procedure Article 94, the court had to provide the factual and legal context of the case in the reference. The Bulgarian Prosecutor objected, arguing that such a reference violated Bulgarian law. Under national case law, even the slightest indication regarding the facts and law of a case could lead to a judge's disqualification. In the event of bias, the judge could be disqualified and face disciplinary proceedings.

In response, the Bulgarian court paused the proceedings and sought another reference from the CJEU. This time, the question was whether compliance with EU procedural rules, specifically the requirement to include the legal and factual context in a preliminary reference, undermined Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. These articles guarantee the impartiality of the national court and the presumption of innocence.

The CJEU ruled that the preliminary reference procedure is not in breach of the Charter. Moreover, the national rule in Bulgaria that threatened judges with disqualification and disciplinary action for providing information necessary for a preliminary reference was found to be contrary to Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

The judgment emphasised the importance of the preliminary reference procedure in the EU judicial system. This procedure is essential for ensuring uniform interpretation, consistency, and the full effect and autonomy of EU law. The CJEU underscored that providing the legal and factual context in a preliminary reference is crucial for the CJEU to answer the question posed and allows other member states to offer their observations on the case.

Furthermore, the CJEU rejected the threat of disqualification and disciplinary action against judges, stating that such measures are contrary to Article 267 TFEU. This ruling reaffirms the foundational role of the preliminary reference procedure and the obligation of member states to support its effectiveness, even in the face of conflicting national rules that might hinder judges' participation in this process.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.