C-684/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimuzu [2018]

C-684/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimuzu [2018]

C-684/16 Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. v Shimizu [2018] involves the question of whether a worker loses the right to a payment in lieu of untaken annual leave on termination if the leave is not applied for during employment. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) clarified that the worker must have been given an opportunity to take the leave, and it is the employer's responsibility to show that it encouraged the worker to do so.

Tetsuji Shimizu was employed by Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. until December 31, 2013. Max-Planck invited Mr Shimizu to take his leave before the termination of employment but did not force him to take it on specific dates. Mr Shimizu, however, took only two days' leave and sought payment for the remaining untaken leave.

Max-Planck's defence was unsuccessful in lower courts, and the case was appealed to the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Federal Labour Court, Germany). The court held that the entitlements to paid annual leave lapsed under national law since they were not taken during the year for which the leave was granted. However, the court sought clarification from the CJEU on the consistency of national law with the Working Time Directive.

The CJEU clarified that the Working Time Directive does not impose any condition on the right to payment in lieu of untaken holiday on termination, except that the employment relationship has terminated, and the worker has not taken all entitled paid annual leave. While national law can set conditions for exercising the right to annual leave, it would be non-compliant for it to prescribe an automatic loss of rights without ensuring the worker had an effective opportunity to take the leave.

The employer is required to encourage the worker to take holiday, inform them of the risk of losing leave, and prove to the court that it fulfilled these obligations. If the worker deliberately declined to take the holiday, and was aware of the consequences, the possibility of losing the right to paid annual leave or payment in lieu on termination is not excluded.

The decision impacts how national laws, especially those aligning with the Working Time Directive, handle the right to annual leave and payment in lieu. It emphasises the employer's responsibility to facilitate the worker's opportunity to take leave and places the burden of proof on the employer. This ensures that the worker's right to annual leave is not automatically lost and depends on the circumstances, including the employer's actions and the worker's awareness.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.