C-935/19 Grupa Warzywna [2021]

C-935/19 Grupa Warzywna [2021], decided by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on April 15, 2021, revolves around the ongoing debate on VAT penalties. The case involves a Polish company, Grupa Warzywna, which faced a VAT penalty after the tax authorities denied its VAT refund application related to the purchase of a property. The penalty was imposed under Article 112b(2) of the Polish VAT Act, allowing for a 20% penalty on corrected tax returns.

Grupa Warzywna purchased a property, and when the VAT refund application was denied, the company faced a 20% penalty for VAT understatement. The company questioned the proportionality and compatibility of this penalty with EU law.

The Wroclaw Provincial Administrative Court (Referring Court) sought a preliminary ruling from the ECJ, questioning the compatibility of Article 112b(2) of the Polish VAT Act with the VAT Directive and EU Treaty, particularly in terms of the proportionality principle.

The ECJ examined the automatic application of VAT penalties and emphasised that sanctions should be tailored to the unique circumstances of each case. The automatic imposition of penalties for VAT understatement without considering intent or circumstances was deemed inconsistent with EU law.

The ECJ highlighted the importance of the proportionality principle in imposing penalties. It stated that penalties should be proportionate to the nature and degree of the violation, and automatic penalties without considering individual circumstances do not adhere to this principle.

The decision was seen as favourable to businesses, as the ECJ emphasised that penalties should consider all circumstances, including the lack of knowledge about detrimental repercussions and the taxpayer's intentions. Penalties should deter fraud without hindering free enterprise.

The ruling sets a precedent for other Member States, emphasising that penalties must be applied within the parameters set by EU law. Member States should consider all circumstances before imposing penalties on taxpayers for VAT-related mistakes.

While complete harmonisation of sanctioning legislation is challenging, the ECJ's decision contributes to a soft harmonisation by highlighting the principles of VAT neutrality and proportionality that all Member States should consider in their sanctions systems.

In conclusion, this case represents a significant development in VAT penalty jurisprudence within the EU, emphasising the need for proportionality and consideration of individual circumstances in imposing sanctions. The decision provides guidance for businesses and Member States alike, contributing to a more harmonised approach in the application of VAT penalties across the EU.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.