Caparo v Dickman [1990]

Caparo Industries PLC v Dickman [1990] UKHL 2 is pivotal in English tort law for establishing the modern test for determining the existence of a duty of care in negligence. The House of Lords, affirming the decision of the Court of Appeal, formulated a three-fold test to ascertain when a duty of care arises. This test stipulates that harm must be reasonably foreseeable as a potential result of the defendant's conduct, there must be a relationship of proximity between the parties, and it must be fair, just, and reasonable to impose liability. The context of this case involved the negligent preparation of company accounts and has since influenced how courts address negligent misstatements and the scope of responsibility.

Caparo Industries purchased shares in Fidelity Plc, a company producing electrical equipment that was performing poorly. Following an initial profit warning and subsequent share price drops, Caparo began acquiring a significant number of Fidelity shares. After taking control of Fidelity, Caparo discovered that the company's financial state was worse than had been reported by its directors and auditors. Consequently, Caparo sued the auditor, Dickman, for negligence in preparing the accounts, seeking to recover losses corresponding to the disparity between the reported and actual financial conditions of Fidelity.

The Court of Appeal, particularly through Lord Justice Bingham, held that auditors owed a duty of care to shareholders when preparing accounts intended to inform investment decisions. Bingham LJ noted that as Caparo was a shareholder, it was entitled to rely on the accounts. However, if Caparo had been a mere outside investor without an existing stake in the company, no such duty would exist due to the lack of proximity. Bingham LJ emphasised that proximity and the fairness, justness, and reasonableness of imposing liability were essential in establishing a duty of care. This nuanced approach was not entirely shared by O'Connor LJ, who dissented, arguing that no duty was owed to either shareholders or external investors.

The House of Lords overturned the Court of Appeal’s decision, ruling unanimously that no duty of care was owed by the auditors to Caparo as individual shareholders or to potential investors. Lord Bridge of Harwich, delivering the leading judgment, affirmed the need for a more refined approach than merely relying on foreseeability to establish a duty of care. He emphasised that the duty must be assessed based on the specific relationship between the parties and the context of the harm suffered. Lord Bridge restated the three-fold test, incorporating principles of proximity and fairness, justness, and reasonableness, which have since become fundamental in negligence law.

The Caparo decision clarified the scope of auditors’ duties, limiting their responsibility to providing information for shareholders to exercise their collective rights rather than making individual investment decisions. This judgment influenced subsequent cases, reinforcing the need for careful analysis of proximity and policy considerations when determining the existence of a duty of care. The Caparo three-stage test has become instrumental in addressing novel duty of care issues, ensuring that liability is imposed only where it is justified by the relationship between the parties and the broader implications for fairness and public policy.

Caparo Industries PLC v Dickman established a structured approach to assessing duty of care in negligence, emphasising the importance of foreseeability, proximity, and the fairness, justness, and reasonableness of imposing liability. This case has significantly influenced the development of negligence law, providing a clear framework for courts to analyse complex issues of duty and responsibility. By delineating the limits of auditors' liability, Caparo has shaped the legal landscape, ensuring that duties of care are recognized only when justified by the circumstances and relationships involved.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.