Case of Proclamations [1610]

The Case of Proclamations [1610] EWHC KB J22 is a significant English constitutional law case that occurred during the reign of King James I (1603–1625). The case played a pivotal role in defining limitations on the royal prerogative and asserting that the monarch could only make laws through Parliament.

During the Tudor period, monarchs believed they had the authority to regulate through royal proclamations without Parliament's consent. However, this absolute power of the monarch to make law began to face challenges from the English judiciary and raised concerns in Parliament. The case emerged in 1610 when James I and Parliament were in conflict over impositions—Parliament opposed the King's power to impose additional duties on imports beyond what Parliament had authorised. James sought to use proclamations to raise funds outside of Parliament.

The Privy Council sought a legal opinion on whether the King, through proclamation, could prohibit new buildings in London or the making of wheat starch. Chief Justice Sir Edward Coke and other judges were asked for their views. Coke, in his judgment, declared that the King could not create new offences or extend the royal prerogative into areas not sanctioned by law. He stated, "the King cannot change any part of the common law, nor create any offence, by his proclamation, which was not an offence before, without parliament."

Coke emphasised that the King had no prerogative except that which the law allowed, reinforcing the principle that the monarch had no power to declare new offences through proclamations. This decision had significant implications, as it limited the scope of the royal prerogative and underscored the importance of parliamentary authority.

Despite the judgment, James I attempted to place his proclamations on a constitutional footing, treating them as if they were statutes. He argued that proclamations were necessary for addressing matters not covered by law. However, this attempt was not fully accepted.

The Case of Proclamations continued to influence English history, becoming a part of the grievances between subsequent monarchs and parliaments, leading up to the English Civil War. Members of Parliament referenced Coke's judgment to challenge the arbitrary use of royal power. Although the issue of the royal prerogative persisted, it was not conclusively resolved until the Bill of Rights in 1689, which established that the Crown's powers were subject to law and could be controlled by statute.

In contemporary times, the Case of Proclamations remains relevant. In the 2017 judicial review decision, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017], the Divisional Court cited principles from the Case of Proclamations to determine the government's power to trigger Brexit. The court affirmed that the King, by proclamation, cannot change any part of the common law, statute law, or customs of the realm.

Furthermore, the Case of Proclamations was cited in the 2019 Supreme Court case R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland [2019], which dealt with the prorogation of Parliament. The case's enduring influence demonstrates its lasting impact on the constitutional law of the United Kingdom.

Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get fully prepared for SQE1 without breaking the bank. Access cost-effective SQE study manuals and 2000 practice questions developed by UOLLB, edited by lawyers, and published by UOL Press.

Turbocharge SQE Performance
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain access to over 2,200 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is approved by UOL School of Law and is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now
  • Titus Mulindwa ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

    ...the UOLLB Notes are a great resource not only to students of law but law practitioners as well as they are a very handy source of legal knowledge even for subjects one did not or is not studying.

  • Emily Wood ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

    These law exam skills genuinely made a huge difference in my law exams. For the first time, I feel confident knowing how to structure my answers to actually get good marks. So glad to have found UOLLB before my exams!

  • Adam Ainley ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

    I found the notes really helpful, making learning a lot more efficient. I would strongly recommend UOLLB to any law student looking for concise and effective study resources.

  • Rena Ramnath-Ramjattan ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

    Wonderful as usual! These notes have always been so helpful and I really a, thankful for this product.

  • Daniel Morgan ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

    The notes have saved me so much time and was highly informative.

  • Demetra Dimokopoulos ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

    Excellent and thorough. These notes are so helpful. Well worth it.

  • Mok Hin ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

    Stuff thoughtfully arranged with relevant examination techniques introduced.

  • K H Tao ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

    Notes with good quality.

  • Ontiretse Pitso ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

    Great
    Digestible.

Join students and legal professionals from Legal 500 firms, top universities and international organisations who trust UOLLB

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Ministry of Defence
Baker Mckenzie
Linklaters
Atsumi & Sakai
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Arizona State University
McGill University
Toronto Metropolitan University
University of Hong Kong (HKU)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)
University of Buckingham
Robert Gordon University
ESSEC Business School
University of Puerto Rico

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Skills

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.