Collateral in Evidence Law
Share
In evidence law, the term collateral typically refers to evidence or matters that are not directly related to the central issues in a case but may be introduced for a limited purpose. Collateral evidence is often introduced to attack or support a witness's credibility rather than to prove or disprove the main issues in the case.
Impeachment: Collateral evidence is often used for the purpose of impeaching a witness's credibility. This means that it is presented to challenge the truthfulness or reliability of a witness's testimony. For example, if a witness testifies about their impeccable character, opposing counsel may introduce collateral evidence to contradict this claim, such as evidence of prior bad acts.
Limited admissibility: Collateral evidence is subject to certain limitations in its admissibility. While it may be allowed for the purpose of impeachment, courts typically restrict the extent to which it can be used. The evidence must be directly related to the witness's credibility and should not turn the trial into a side issue or a trial within a trial.
Balancing test: Judges often use a balancing test to determine whether collateral evidence should be admitted. This involves weighing the probative value of the evidence in challenging a witness's credibility against its potential for causing confusion, prejudice, or wasting time in the trial.
Relevance to credibility: Collateral evidence must be relevant to the issue of credibility. In other words, it should have some bearing on whether the witness is telling the truth or has a motive to lie. Evidence that is entirely unrelated to credibility or the central issues of the case may be excluded.
Example: Suppose a witness in a criminal trial testifies that they saw the defendant commit a crime. If the defence attorney wants to impeach this witness's credibility by introducing evidence that the witness has a history of making false accusations in other unrelated situations, this would be considered collateral evidence. Its purpose is to cast doubt on the witness's overall credibility rather than to directly challenge the witness's account of the crime in question.
In summary, collateral evidence is evidence that is introduced for the limited purpose of impeaching a witness's credibility. While it may be admitted in court, its use is typically subject to restrictions, and judges must carefully balance its probative value against the potential for confusion or prejudice in the trial.
Impeachment: Collateral evidence is often used for the purpose of impeaching a witness's credibility. This means that it is presented to challenge the truthfulness or reliability of a witness's testimony. For example, if a witness testifies about their impeccable character, opposing counsel may introduce collateral evidence to contradict this claim, such as evidence of prior bad acts.
Limited admissibility: Collateral evidence is subject to certain limitations in its admissibility. While it may be allowed for the purpose of impeachment, courts typically restrict the extent to which it can be used. The evidence must be directly related to the witness's credibility and should not turn the trial into a side issue or a trial within a trial.
Balancing test: Judges often use a balancing test to determine whether collateral evidence should be admitted. This involves weighing the probative value of the evidence in challenging a witness's credibility against its potential for causing confusion, prejudice, or wasting time in the trial.
Relevance to credibility: Collateral evidence must be relevant to the issue of credibility. In other words, it should have some bearing on whether the witness is telling the truth or has a motive to lie. Evidence that is entirely unrelated to credibility or the central issues of the case may be excluded.
Example: Suppose a witness in a criminal trial testifies that they saw the defendant commit a crime. If the defence attorney wants to impeach this witness's credibility by introducing evidence that the witness has a history of making false accusations in other unrelated situations, this would be considered collateral evidence. Its purpose is to cast doubt on the witness's overall credibility rather than to directly challenge the witness's account of the crime in question.
In summary, collateral evidence is evidence that is introduced for the limited purpose of impeaching a witness's credibility. While it may be admitted in court, its use is typically subject to restrictions, and judges must carefully balance its probative value against the potential for confusion or prejudice in the trial.
