Comparative Negligence

Comparative Negligence

Comparative negligence is a legal principle that determines the degree of fault or responsibility of each party involved in a civil lawsuit or personal injury claim. It is applied when more than one party is found to be at fault for the damages or injuries that occurred.

Under the concept of comparative negligence, the damages awarded to the injured party are reduced in proportion to his own degree of fault, unlike contributory negligence where the injured party is completely bared from recovery. This means that if a person is partially responsible for his own injuries or damages, his compensation will be reduced by his percentage of fault. There are two main types of comparative negligence:

Pure comparative negligence: In jurisdictions that follow the pure comparative negligence rule, such as Alaska, Arizona, California, New York, and Florida in the United States, the injured party can recover damages even if his is primarily at fault. However, the amount of compensation he will receive is reduced by his percentage of fault. For example, if a court determines that the injured party is 30% at fault and the damages awarded are $100,000, he would receive $70,000 (70% of the total damages).

Modified comparative negligence: A majority of US jurisdictions, such as Montana, Oregon, and Nevada, follow a modified comparative negligence rule. Under this rule, an injured party can only recover damages if his degree of fault is below a certain threshold. This threshold is often set at 50% or 51%. If the injured party is found to be equally or more at fault than the other party, he is barred from recovering any damages. However, if his degree of fault is below the threshold, his compensation is reduced by his percentage of fault. For example, if the threshold is 50% and the injured party is found to be 40% at fault, he would receive 60% of the total damages.

It should be noted that in England and Wales the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 provides that the court will determine the degree of fault of the injured party who contributed partly to his own injury and apportion the damages according to the his share of responsibility. The Act does not specify a threshold beyond which the injured party is barred from recovery, so it can be said that England and Wales largely follows the pure comparative negligence.

Comparative negligence is used to ensure a fair distribution of responsibility and compensation in cases where multiple parties share fault. It encourages individuals to take reasonable care for their own safety and minimises the potential for excessive compensation when the injured party is partially responsible for his own injuries. The specific rules and application of comparative negligence can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the laws of the relevant state or country.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.