Contributory Negligence vs Comparative Negligence

Contributory negligence and comparative negligence are legal doctrines that come into play when determining the extent to which a party can be held responsible for damages or injuries in a civil lawsuit.

Contributory Negligence
Contributory negligence is an older legal doctrine that follows the "all or nothing" principle. Under this doctrine, if a plaintiff is found to have contributed to his own injuries or damages in any way, even if it is a minor percentage, he is completely barred from recovering any compensation from the defendant. In other words, if the plaintiff is even slightly at fault, he is considered to have "contributed" to the incident, and his claim is dismissed entirely.

For example, suppose a pedestrian is jaywalking across a busy street, and a driver, who is slightly above the speed limit, hits the pedestrian. Even if the driver was primarily at fault, if the pedestrian's jaywalking is deemed to be a contributing factor, the pedestrian may be considered "contributorily negligent." In such a case, the pedestrian would be completely barred from recovering any damages from the driver, regardless of the extent of the driver's negligence.

Comparative Negligence
Comparative negligence is a more modern and widely adopted legal doctrine that allows for a more equitable distribution of fault and damages. There are two main types of comparative negligence:

Pure comparative negligence: In jurisdictions that follow the pure comparative negligence rule, such as Alaska, Arizona, California, New York, and Florida in the United States, the court determines the total amount of damages suffered by the plaintiff and assigns a percentage of fault to each party involved in the incident, including the plaintiff. The plaintiff's recoverable damages are then reduced by his assigned percentage of fault. For example, if a court determines that a plaintiff's damages amount to $100,000 and finds the plaintiff 20% at fault, the plaintiff would be entitled to recover $80,000 (i.e., $100,000 – 20% = $80,000). The plaintiff can still recover compensation even if he is predominantly at fault, although the amount will be reduced proportionately.

Modified comparative negligence: In jurisdictions that follow the modified comparative negligence rule, such as Montana, Oregon, and Nevada in the United States, there is a threshold beyond which the plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages. This threshold is typically set at 50% or 51%. If the plaintiff's assigned percentage of fault falls below the threshold, he can recover damages proportionally reduced by his degree of fault. However, if his assigned percentage of fault exceeds the threshold, he is completely barred from recovering any compensation. For example, if the plaintiff is found 30% at fault and the total damages are $100,000, he would be entitled to recover $70,000 (i.e., $100,000 – 30% = $70,000). However, if the plaintiff's assigned percentage of fault exceeds the threshold, he would be completely barred from recovering any compensation. In this scenario, if the plaintiff is found 51% at fault or higher, he would not receive any damages.

Comparative negligence provides a more flexible and fair approach compared to contributory negligence, as it takes into account the relative fault of each party involved in an incident when determining liability and damages. It allows plaintiffs to recover some compensation even if they are partially responsible for the incident, although the exact rules and thresholds may vary depending on the jurisdiction.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.