Daulia v Four Millbank Nominees [1977]

Daulia Ltd v Four Millbank Nominees Ltd [1977] EWCA Civ 5 is an English contract law case that revolves around unilateral contracts. The case addresses the issue of when an offer can be withdrawn once performance has commenced.

Daulia Ltd sought to buy premises in Millbank, London, from Four Millbank Nominees Ltd, mortgagees in possession. Although formal contracts were never exchanged, Daulia claimed they had a unilateral contract where Four Millbank agreed to enter into a written contract if Daulia attended their offices with a draft contract and a deposit. When Daulia's representatives arrived, Four Millbank refused to exchange, leading to Daulia claiming a breach of the oral agreement.

The Court of Appeal dismissed Daulia's appeal. Goff LJ acknowledged the somewhat anomalous nature of a unilateral contract, where there is no contract until the offeree starts to perform the condition. He emphasised that doubts exist about whether the offeror becomes bound as soon as performance begins or only upon full completion.

Goff LJ held that Daulia fully performed or satisfied the condition when they presented themselves with a banker's draft and the written contract at the agreed time and place. Actual exchange, which did not happen, would have been additional to the satisfaction of the condition.

While acknowledging the general principle that the offeror is entitled to require full performance of the condition, Goff LJ introduced an important qualification. Once the offeree starts to perform, there is an implied obligation on the offeror not to prevent the condition from being satisfied. Revocation by the offeror becomes impossible once the offeree has embarked on performance.

Goff LJ discussed the concept of part performance and expressed doubt about the assertion that there can never be part performance of a unilateral contract. He stated that, in many cases, the offeree's acts may amount to part performance, though in this case, they did not suggest the existence of a contract.

Goff LJ considered whether the unilateral contract fell within the category of a contract for the sale or other disposition of land or any interest in land. He concluded that the unilateral contract, although not a contract for the sale of land, was a contract for some other disposition of an interest in land because it would create an equitable interest in the land if fulfilled.

Goff LJ rejected the argument that the acts of part performance were sufficient to suggest the existence of a contract. He emphasised that the acts indicated that the parties were about to make or contemplate making a contract, not that there was a contract in existence.

In summary, the Court held that Daulia's claim failed because there was no binding contract, the acts of part performance did not prove the existence of a contract, and the unilateral contract was unenforceable. The appeal was dismissed.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.