Defence of Diminished Responsibility
Share
The defence of diminished responsibility is a legal defence that can be used in criminal trials where the accused is charged with murder, but argues that they should be convicted of the lesser offence of manslaughter due to their state of mind at the time of the offence.
To successfully argue diminished responsibility, the accused must demonstrate that at the time of the offence, they were suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning that:
The abnormality of mental functioning may arise from a recognised mental disorder, such as depression, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder. Alternatively, it may arise from a physical condition, such as a brain injury, that affects the accused's mental functioning.
If the defence of diminished responsibility is accepted by the court, the accused will be found guilty of the lesser offence of manslaughter rather than murder. The sentence for manslaughter is generally less severe than the sentence for murder.
It is important to note that the defence of diminished responsibility is a complex and controversial area of law, and there is debate over whether it is an appropriate defence. Some argue that it may be used to excuse serious criminal behaviour, while others argue that it is necessary to ensure that individuals with mental disorders are not unfairly punished for their actions. Ultimately, the use of the defence will depend on the specific circumstances of each case and the judgment of the court.
To successfully argue diminished responsibility, the accused must demonstrate that at the time of the offence, they were suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning that:
- Substantially impaired their ability to understand the nature of their conduct; or
- Substantially impaired their ability to form a rational judgment; or
- Substantially impaired their ability to exercise self-control.
The abnormality of mental functioning may arise from a recognised mental disorder, such as depression, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder. Alternatively, it may arise from a physical condition, such as a brain injury, that affects the accused's mental functioning.
If the defence of diminished responsibility is accepted by the court, the accused will be found guilty of the lesser offence of manslaughter rather than murder. The sentence for manslaughter is generally less severe than the sentence for murder.
It is important to note that the defence of diminished responsibility is a complex and controversial area of law, and there is debate over whether it is an appropriate defence. Some argue that it may be used to excuse serious criminal behaviour, while others argue that it is necessary to ensure that individuals with mental disorders are not unfairly punished for their actions. Ultimately, the use of the defence will depend on the specific circumstances of each case and the judgment of the court.
