Discuss the disadvantages of using lay persons in the criminal justice system

The inclusion of community representatives aims to enhance public participation, increase legitimacy, and promote a diversity of perspectives. While the use of lay persons, such as lay magistrates and juries, in the criminal justice system has several advantages, there are also some disadvantages to consider.

Limited legal knowledge: Lay persons in the criminal justice system, including lay magistrates and jury members, typically do not have formal legal training. They may have limited knowledge of complex legal principles, rules of evidence, or procedural nuances. This can potentially lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations of the law during trial proceedings.

Inconsistent decision-making: The decisions made by lay persons in the criminal justice system, particularly in the case of juries, can sometimes be inconsistent. Different juries may reach different verdicts in similar cases, leading to a lack of uniformity in outcomes. This inconsistency can undermine the perceived fairness and credibility of the justice system.

Vulnerability to bias: Lay persons may be susceptible to biases and prejudices, both conscious and unconscious, that could influence their decision-making. Despite instructions from the judge to base their decisions solely on the evidence presented in court, personal biases may unintentionally impact their judgments. This can result in unfair outcomes or potential miscarriages of justice.

Difficulty in understanding complex cases: Lay persons may struggle to comprehend complex legal issues or intricate factual evidence in certain cases. This is particularly relevant in trials involving technical or scientific evidence, which may require specialised knowledge or expertise. Difficulty in understanding complex cases can affect the quality of decision-making and potentially lead to erroneous outcomes.

Time and resource constraints: The involvement of lay persons in the criminal justice system can contribute to delays in trial proceedings. For example, jury trials require additional time for jury selection, instructions, and deliberations. Moreover, the need to find and train lay magistrates or jurors can be resource-intensive for the justice system.

Vulnerability to external influences: Lay persons involved in the criminal justice system, particularly jurors, may be susceptible to external influences that could compromise their impartiality. This includes media coverage, public opinion, or personal experiences that may unduly influence their decision-making process.

Awareness of these disadvantages is crucial to continually evaluate and improve the effectiveness and fairness of the criminal justice system. Measures such as judicial instructions, legal assistance, and ongoing training can help mitigate these disadvantages and enhance the role of lay persons in the criminal justice process.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.