Discuss the relationship between 'sanction' and 'command' theories of law, with reference to the work of Austin and Kelsen

In examining the relationship between the command and sanction theories of law as articulated by Austin and Kelsen respectively, it becomes evident that while both theories fall under the umbrella of sanction theories, they diverge significantly in their conceptualisation of the nature of law and its enforcement.

John Austin's command theory posits that law is fundamentally a command issued by a sovereign backed by the threat of sanction. In other words, according to Austin, a law is essentially a command that obliges obedience, and failure to comply with this command results in the imposition of sanctions by the sovereign authority. This perspective emphasises the coercive aspect of law and underscores the importance of enforcement mechanisms in maintaining social order.

On the other hand, Hans Kelsen's theory presents a more subtle understanding of law. Kelsen argues that a legal norm is not merely a command but rather a normative structure that authorises or empowers officials to apply sanctions in specific circumstances. In Kelsen's view, a legal system consists of a hierarchy of norms, with each norm deriving its validity from a higher norm, ultimately culminating in a basic norm or Grundnorm. This hierarchical structure emphasises the autonomy of legal norms and their inherent authority to regulate behaviour within a given legal system.

While both Austin and Kelsen advocate for sanction-based theories of law, their conceptualisations differ in significant ways. Austin focuses on the coercive nature of law, viewing it primarily as a command backed by the threat of sanction. In contrast, Kelsen emphasises the normative structure of law, wherein legal norms authorise the application of sanctions but are not reducible to mere commands.

However, it is important to note that both theories have faced criticism, particularly from HLA Hart who argues that sanction theories fail to capture the diverse ways in which the law guides behaviour. He highlights the importance of legal rules not only in deterring undesirable conduct through sanctions but also in providing guidance and coordination for individuals within a legal system.

In conclusion, while both Austin's command theory and Kelsen's normative theory fall under the category of sanction theories, they differ in their conceptualisations of the nature of law and its enforcement mechanisms. Despite criticisms, both theories contribute valuable insights into the complex relationship between law, authority, and social order.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.