Doctrines of Election
Share
The doctrines of election are equitable principles that apply when a person is given a choice between two or more inconsistent rights or benefits. These doctrines aim to ensure fairness and prevent individuals from taking advantage of contradictory positions.
The principle of election arises in situations where a person receives a benefit or property under a will, trust, or other instrument, but that person also has an obligation or duty associated with the same instrument that is inconsistent with the benefit received. In such cases, the person is required to make an election between accepting the benefit or adhering to the obligation. There are two main doctrines of election:
The doctrine of ademption: This doctrine applies in the context of a will or testamentary gift. It states that if a testator makes a specific gift in their will, and that specific asset is no longer in the testator's estate at the time of their death (e.g., it was sold or otherwise disposed of), the intended beneficiary must make an election. The beneficiary can either accept an equivalent amount of money or property from the estate in lieu of the specific gift or give up their claim to any benefit from the estate. The doctrine prevents a beneficiary from receiving both the specific gift and the proceeds from the sale of the same asset.
The doctrine of equitable election: This doctrine applies in situations where a person receives a benefit under a document (such as a will or trust) but is also obligated to transfer property to another party under the same document. The doctrine requires the beneficiary to make an election between accepting the benefit or complying with the obligation. If the beneficiary chooses to accept the benefit, they must transfer the property or assets specified in the document to the other party. The doctrine prevents a beneficiary from benefiting from an instrument while disregarding the associated obligations.
The doctrines of election are rooted in equity and aim to prevent unjust enrichment and ensure fairness in situations where conflicting rights or benefits arise. They provide a framework for resolving conflicts of interest and require individuals to make a clear choice between inconsistent positions. The application of these doctrines may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of each case. It is advisable to seek legal advice in matters involving the doctrines of election to understand the implications and requirements in a particular situation.
The principle of election arises in situations where a person receives a benefit or property under a will, trust, or other instrument, but that person also has an obligation or duty associated with the same instrument that is inconsistent with the benefit received. In such cases, the person is required to make an election between accepting the benefit or adhering to the obligation. There are two main doctrines of election:
The doctrine of ademption: This doctrine applies in the context of a will or testamentary gift. It states that if a testator makes a specific gift in their will, and that specific asset is no longer in the testator's estate at the time of their death (e.g., it was sold or otherwise disposed of), the intended beneficiary must make an election. The beneficiary can either accept an equivalent amount of money or property from the estate in lieu of the specific gift or give up their claim to any benefit from the estate. The doctrine prevents a beneficiary from receiving both the specific gift and the proceeds from the sale of the same asset.
The doctrine of equitable election: This doctrine applies in situations where a person receives a benefit under a document (such as a will or trust) but is also obligated to transfer property to another party under the same document. The doctrine requires the beneficiary to make an election between accepting the benefit or complying with the obligation. If the beneficiary chooses to accept the benefit, they must transfer the property or assets specified in the document to the other party. The doctrine prevents a beneficiary from benefiting from an instrument while disregarding the associated obligations.
The doctrines of election are rooted in equity and aim to prevent unjust enrichment and ensure fairness in situations where conflicting rights or benefits arise. They provide a framework for resolving conflicts of interest and require individuals to make a clear choice between inconsistent positions. The application of these doctrines may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of each case. It is advisable to seek legal advice in matters involving the doctrines of election to understand the implications and requirements in a particular situation.
