Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]

Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]

Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] UKHL 100 is a landmark case in Tort Law that established the fundamental principle of the duty of care and laid the foundation for the modern concept of negligence. This case played a pivotal role in shaping the legal framework for personal injury claims and the responsibilities of manufacturers toward consumers.

In the summer of 1928, May Donoghue visited a café in Paisley, Scotland. A friend bought her a bottle of ginger beer, which was manufactured by David Stevenson. Mrs Donoghue consumed most of the ginger beer, and as she poured the remaining ginger beer into a glass, a decomposed snail came out of the bottle. This incident caused Mrs Donoghue to become ill, and she subsequently brought a legal action against Stevenson, claiming damages for her illness.

The central legal issue in this case was whether the manufacturer, David Stevenson, owed a duty of care to consumers like Mrs Donoghue and whether the circumstances of this case gave rise to a claim in negligence.

The House of Lords ruled in favour of Mrs Donoghue, establishing a groundbreaking legal principle that has since become a cornerstone of Tort Law. The judgment, delivered by Lord Atkin, articulated the famous neighbour principle, stating that individuals owe a duty of care to those who are closely and directly affected by their actions and decisions. In other words, one must take reasonable care to avoid causing harm to others who might be reasonably foreseeable as being affected by their actions.

The ruling in Donoghue v Stevenson is significant as it set a precedent that has been widely cited and followed in subsequent negligence cases, both in the UK and in other common law jurisdictions. The case laid the groundwork for the modern concept of negligence, whereby a breach of duty of care leading to harm can result in a legal claim for damages.

The case established the duty of care owed by manufacturers to consumers. Manufacturers must ensure that their products are safe for consumers, as failure to do so can result in legal liability.

The case emphasised that harm must be reasonably foreseeable for a duty of care to arise. In this instance, it was foreseeable that a consumer might be harmed by consuming a contaminated product.

The case clarified the notion of proximity between parties, i.e. the neighbouring principle, which is essential for establishing a duty of care. The relationship between the manufacturer and the consumer was considered sufficiently proximate to warrant a duty of care.

Donoghue v Stevenson stands as a landmark judgment that significantly impacted the development of negligence law, emphasising the responsibility of individuals and businesses to act in ways that avoid causing harm to others who may be affected by their actions.

Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.