Douglas v Hello! Ltd [2005]

Douglas v Hello! Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 595 is a significant legal case in the UK involving the unauthorised publication of photographs from the wedding of the celebrities Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones. This case revolved around issues related to the right of privacy, breach of confidence, and contractual obligations.

Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones had entered into an exclusive contract with OK! Magazine worth £1,000,000 to cover their wedding, which took place in 2000 at the Plaza Hotel in New York. This contract granted OK! Magazine the exclusive rights to publish photographs of the wedding. The couple had the authority to approve the selection of photographs to be used in the magazine. To ensure the exclusivity of their coverage, strict security measures were implemented, including restricting the taking of photographs by guests and closing the event to the media.

Despite these measures, a freelance photographer named Rupert Thorpe managed to infiltrate the wedding and take unauthorised photographs of the couple. These unauthorised images were subsequently sold to Hello! Magazine, a rival publication that had previously attempted to obtain the rights to the wedding photographs.

In the initial legal proceedings, Douglas v Hello! [2001], the Douglases and OK! Magazine sought an injunction to prevent the publication of unauthorised photographs. They made claims based on breach of confidence, invasion of privacy, breach of the Data Protection Act 1998, and allegations of intention to damage and conspiracy to injure. However, the successful claims were only breach of confidence and breach of the Data Protection Act.The High Court granted an injunction, but this decision was later overturned by the Court of Appeal.

In the subsequent appeal, Douglas v Hello! [2005], the Court of Appeal ruled that OK! Magazine retained confidence in publishing the photographs approved by the Douglases but maintained a right to privacy concerning the remaining photographs. The only way OK! Magazine could seek damages against Hello! Magazine was through a claim for breach of confidence.

This case was ultimately send to the House of Lord in OBG Ltd v Allan [2007] which combined three economic tort cases together, along with Mainstream Properties Ltd v Young. The House of Lords, in a 3-2 judgment, agreed that the wedding photographs were confidential, that circumstances of confidence existed, and that the publication of the photographs had been detrimental to OK! Magazine.

This case became significant in defining the legal boundaries of privacy, confidentiality, and the rights of parties involved in similar contractual agreements, especially in the context of high-profile events like celebrity weddings.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.