Erie Railroad Co v Tompkins 1938

Erie Railroad Co v Tompkins 1938

Erie Railroad Co v Tompkins [1938] 304 US 64 is a US landmark case decided by the Supreme Court in 1938. The case addressed the issue of whether federal common law could apply in certain situations when there is a lack of controlling state law.

The case originated from an accident involving Harry Tompkins, who was walking along the Erie Railroad tracks in Pennsylvania when he was struck by a protruding door on one of the railroad's passing trains. Tompkins sued the Erie Railroad Company in federal court, alleging negligence.

The central question in the case was whether federal common law or state law should be applied to determine the railroad's liability. At the time, federal courts often applied federal common law in diversity cases, which involved disputes between citizens of different states. In this case, there was no specific state law governing the circumstances, so the lower federal courts relied on federal common law to find the railroad liable.

However, the Supreme Court, in a 6-2 decision, rejected the application of federal common law in diversity cases and held that federal courts should not create general common law rules that bind state courts in such cases. Instead, state law should govern unless there is a specific federal law applicable to the issue.

The Court's decision in Erie Railroad Co v Tompkins effectively overturned the long-standing doctrine of federal common law in diversity cases established in Swift v Tyson [1842]. It emphasised the importance of state law and the need for federal courts to adhere to state court decisions and statutes when deciding cases based on diversity jurisdiction.

This case established the Erie doctrine, which requires federal courts to apply state substantive law and federal procedural law in diversity cases. It significantly affected the development of American legal practice by reinforcing the principle that federal courts should not create substantive common law.

The Erie Railroad Co v Tompkins decision had a broad impact on federal jurisdiction and the relationship between federal and state law. It affirmed the principle that federal courts should respect state sovereignty and respect the diversity of state laws when adjudicating cases.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.