Factual Causation

Factual causation is a legal concept used to determine whether a particular action or event caused a specific consequence or harm. It is a fundamental element in both criminal and civil law, particularly in tort law, where establishing causation is essential to proving liability. Factual causation seeks to establish a direct link between the defendant's conduct and the resulting damage or injury, essentially asking the question: "But for the defendant's actions, would the harm have occurred?"

The primary method used to establish factual causation is the but-for test. This test asks whether the harm would have occurred but for the defendant's conduct. If the answer is no—meaning that the harm would not have occurred without the defendant's actions—then factual causation is established. For example, if a driver runs a red light and hits a pedestrian, causing injury, the but-for test would ask: "But for the driver's failure to stop at the red light, would the pedestrian have been injured?" If the injury would not have occurred without the driver's action, then factual causation is established.

In tort law, factual causation is a crucial element in negligence claims. The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant's breach of duty directly caused the harm. For instance, in a medical malpractice case, the patient must show that the doctor's negligence (such as a misdiagnosis or improper treatment) was the direct cause of their injury or worsening condition. The but-for test is applied to establish this link between the doctor's conduct and the patient's harm.

While the but-for test is a straightforward way to establish factual causation, it has limitations and may not always be adequate in complex cases involving multiple causes or intervening events. For example, if two separate parties independently contribute to a harm, the but-for test might fail to clearly identify each party's responsibility. In such cases, courts may use additional tests and principles, such as the substantial factor test, which assesses whether the defendant's conduct was a substantial factor in bringing about the harm.

The substantial factor test is used in situations where multiple causes contribute to the harm. This test asks whether the defendant's conduct was a substantial factor in causing the injury, even if other factors also played a role. For instance, if two factories release pollutants into a river, resulting in the contamination of water supply and causing harm to residents, each factory's actions could be considered a substantial factor in the harm, even if the exact contribution of each cannot be precisely determined.

Factual causation has been shaped by various legal precedents and case law. One landmark case is Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital Management Committee (1969), where the but-for test was applied. In this case, a man died of arsenic poisoning after being negligently turned away from a hospital. However, it was determined that even if he had received prompt medical attention, he would have died anyway due to the amount of poison ingested. Thus, the hospital's negligence was not the factual cause of death, illustrating the application of the but-for test.

Factual causation is a critical concept in the legal determination of liability, ensuring that there is a direct link between the defendant's conduct and the harm suffered by the plaintiff. The but-for test is the primary method used to establish this link, though other tests like the substantial factor test may be employed in more complex cases. By rigorously applying these principles, courts aim to ensure that liability is fairly and accurately assigned, reflecting the true cause-and-effect relationships in legal disputes.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.