Foakes v Beer [1884]

Foakes v Beer [1884] UKHL 1 is a leading contract law case decided by the House of Lords on the legal concept of consideration. The case established the rule preventing parties from discharging an obligation through partial performance, reinforcing the pre-existing duty rule established in Pinnel's Case [1602].

Dr John Weston Foakes owed Julia Beer a substantial sum of £2,090 19s following a court judgment. In an attempt to avoid further legal actions, Beer and Foakes reached an agreement. Beer agreed not to take legal action if Foakes signed an agreement to pay an initial sum of £500 and make subsequent payments of £150 twice a year until the entire amount was repaid. Foakes, facing financial difficulties, also sought to waive any interest on the amount owed. After Foakes paid back the principal but not the interest, Beer sued for the unpaid interest.

At the trial in the Queen's Bench, the court ruled in favour of Foakes, upholding the decision based on the agreement between the parties. Watkin Williams J found there was ample consideration for the agreement. On appeal to the Court of Appeal, Brett MR reversed the decision, asserting that there was no consideration for the agreement. Lindley LJ and Fry LJ concurred without providing detailed opinions.

The House of Lords, comprising Earl of Selborne LC, Lord Watson, and Lord FitzGerald, upheld the Court of Appeal's decision in favour of Beer. They reasoned that although the agreement did not explicitly include interest, it could be implied, making the agreement enforceable. However, the promise to pay a debt was considered insufficient consideration, as there was no additional benefit from Foakes to Beer beyond what was already owed.

It was held that payment of a lesser sum on the day, i.e. on or after the due date of a money debt cannot be any satisfaction of the whole. Nevertheless, Lord Blackburn, while not overtly dissenting, expressed reservations about the continued application of the Pinnel's case rule. He suggested that prompt payment of a part of a debt might often be more beneficial to creditors than insisting on full payment.

Foakes v Beer, essentially reiterating the pre-existing duty rule from Pinnel's case, gained attention for its strict application of the consideration doctrine. However, it was later treated with skepticism by Lord Denning in Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947], who argued that it was effectively overruled by the concept of promissory estoppel introduced in the 1877 case of Hughes v Metropolitan Railway Co [1877]. The case underscores the historical tension between the rigidity of consideration rules and the need for flexibility in certain circumstances.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.