Gambotto v WCP [1995]

Gambotto v WCP [1995]

In Gambotto v WCP [1995] 127 ALR 417, the Australian High Court addressed the issue of share expropriation clauses in a company's articles of association. This principle, often referred to as the Gambotto rule, was later rejected by the UK Privy Council in Citco Banking Corp v Pusser’s Ltd [2007].

The case involved WCP Ltd, where the majority shareholders, subsidiaries of Industrial Equity Ltd (IEL), owned about 99.7% of the company's shares. Giancarlo Gambotto and Eliandri Sandri, holding approximately 0.094% of the shares, resisted attempts by IEL to acquire their shares for taxation and administrative benefits. IEL proposed amending the company's constitution to allow majority shareholders with over 90% of shares to forcibly acquire minority shares. Despite a reasonable offer of $1.85 per share, Gambotto and Sandri opposed the sale and initiated legal proceedings.

The High Court of Australia ruled that the proposed amendment was invalid, emphasising the importance of a proper purpose for constitutional amendments. The Court rejected the traditional bona fide benefit test from Allen v Gold Reefs of West Africa Ltd [1900], stating that a fair expropriation advancing the interests of the company or the majority alone was insufficient justification.

Instead, the High Court established a two-limbed test for constitutional amendments permitting share expropriation. The power must be exercisable for a permissible purpose, and its exercise must not operate oppressively in relation to minority shareholders. The Court asserted that expropriation could be justified if the continued shareholding of the minority was reasonably seen as detrimental to the company or its affairs, and if expropriation was a reasonable means of eliminating or mitigating that detriment.

This decision introduced a third category for alterations of articles, distinct from those affecting company-shareholder and shareholder-shareholder interests. It underscored the nuanced approach required for amendments involving the expropriation of minority shares, emphasising proper purpose and protection against oppressive consequences.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.