Geary v Rankine [2012]

Geary v Rankine [2012] EWCA Civ 555 is a significant English land law case concerning the establishment of constructive trusts in relation to beneficial interests in a business enterprise between romantic partners. The case revolves around the absence of formal agreements, direct financial contributions, and formal wages in a guest house venture.

The case involves Mrs Geary and Mr Rankine, who entered a romantic relationship in 1990. In 1996, Mr Rankine purchased a guest house with his savings. Initially, the plan was for the property to be managed by someone else, but managerial issues prompted Rankine to take over. Mrs Geary actively participated in the business without receiving formal wages. The relationship soured, leading Geary to claim a beneficial interest in the guest house through either a business partnership or a constructive trust.

The initial judgment rejected Geary's claim, prompting her appeal. The Court of Appeal, considering the legal title solely in Rankine's name, analysed the question of whether there was a common intention for Geary to possess a beneficial interest. Referring to Jones v Kernott [2011], the court emphasised an objective evaluation of the parties' conduct. While a common intention to run the business together was acknowledged, extending this to a common intention about property ownership was deemed impermissible. The court concluded that Geary failed to establish a constructive trust.

Lewison LJ's closing statement highlighted the impermissibility of assuming a common intention for property ownership based on the common intention to run a business together. Geary's evidence, including Rankine's refusal to recognise her until divorce and his reluctance to grant security for her and her son, was considered inconsistent with an intention for her to have a beneficial interest in the property.

This case underscores the need for clarity in establishing beneficial interests in business ventures, especially in the absence of formal agreements. The case emphasises the importance of objective evaluations of common intentions and highlights the challenges of extending partnership expectations to property ownership without explicit agreements.

In summary, this case contributes valuable insights into the realm of constructive trusts, particularly within business enterprises involving romantic partners. The case serves as a reminder of the nuanced assessments required when determining beneficial interests in the absence of formal documentation and the significance of parties' conduct in shaping legal outcomes.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance Here

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.