Goldman v Hargrave [1967]

Goldman v Hargrave [1967] 1 AC 645 is an English tort law case concerning negligence and nuisance, particularly focusing on cases involving omissions and the liability arising from a failure to remove a known or foreseeable source of danger.

The case centred around the defendant's actions concerning a tree on their land that was struck by lightning and caught fire. After chopping down the tree, the defendant did not take measures to extinguish the fire, which later spread to the claimant's land, leading to legal proceedings alleging negligence and nuisance.

The legal principles established in this case emphasise the duty of care in cases of omissions. It is highlighted that a person can be held liable in both negligence and nuisance when failing to address a known or foreseeable danger. The duty to remove a hazard arises from the knowledge of the danger, the ability to foresee the harm that may result from inaction, and the capacity to abate the hazard.

A significant aspect of the case is the consideration of the individual circumstances of the defendant, representing an exception to the usual objective standard of care. The law, as established in this case, recognises that the circumstances in which a hazard is thrust upon a defendant, through no seeking or fault of their own, must be taken into account. The balancing act involves considering the physical ability and financial resources of the occupier against the magnitude of the hazard when determining the standard of care owed.

Lord Wilberforce, delivering the judgment, drew no distinction between liability in negligence and nuisance. He emphasised that the standard of care should be reasonable in the individual circumstances of the case. The court considered that the physical ability and financial resources of the defendant should be balanced against the magnitude of the hazard. In this specific case, where the removal of the hazard required little effort and no significant expenditure, the defendant was found negligent for failing to take reasonable action.

This case is significant in providing a nuanced approach to the standard of care in cases involving omissions, acknowledging the need to consider the specific circumstances of the defendant. The case underscores the importance of balancing the foreseeability of harm with the individual capacity of the defendant, contributing to the broader understanding of negligence and nuisance law.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance Here

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.