Hadley v Baxendale [1854]

Hadley v Baxendale [1854]

Hadley & Anor v Baxendale & Ors [1854] EWHC J70 is a landmark English contract law case that established a fundamental rule for determining consequential damages resulting from a breach of contract. The case articulated that a party in breach is liable for all losses foreseeable by the contracting parties at the time of the agreement. However, if the non-breaching party possesses special knowledge unknown to the party in breach, the liability is limited to losses that the breaching party could have foreseen based on the information available to them.

Mr Hadley, a miller, and another party in a partnership, contracted with Baxendale and others for the delivery of a new crankshaft for a steam engine. The purpose was to replace the broken crankshaft, and timely delivery was crucial to ensure that the new part fit properly. Baxendale failed to deliver on the agreed-upon date, causing Hadley to incur losses in his milling business. Hadley sought damages for the profits lost due to the late delivery.

Baron Sir Edward Hall Alderson of the Court of Exchequer ruled that Baxendale could only be held liable for losses that were generally foreseeable or losses that Hadley had communicated as special circumstances in advance. The court emphasised that damages must arise either naturally from the breach or be reasonably contemplated by both parties at the time of making the contract as the probable result of the breach. If special circumstances are known and communicated, those losses can be recovered.

Baron Alderson's decision rejected Hadley's claim for lost profits, highlighting that the loss of profits could not reasonably be considered a consequence of the breach that both parties contemplated. The court clarified that if special circumstances were unknown to the party in breach, they could only be held liable for losses typically resulting from a breach of contract, not losses influenced by undisclosed special circumstances.

The significance of this case lies in its establishment of a guiding principle for assessing damages in breach of contract cases. The decision influenced the development of contract law, shaping the understanding of foreseeability and the scope of recoverable damages. It has been cited and followed in numerous cases, becoming a foundational element in contract law jurisprudence.

Despite its influence, scholars have critiqued the simplicity of the foreseeability test and highlighted its potential circularity. The rule established in this case has undergone analysis and development, with the courts recognising exceptions and nuances based on the specific circumstances of each case. The case remains a key reference point in the evaluation of damages in contract law, demonstrating the delicate balance between foreseeability and the knowledge possessed by the parties involved.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.