Hearsay Evidence

Hearsay evidence refers to an out-of-court statement made by someone (the declarant) that is offered as evidence in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted in that statement. In other words, hearsay is a statement made by a person outside the courtroom, which is being presented in court to prove that what was said in the statement is true. It involves the use of second-hand or indirect statements to establish the truth of the information contained in those statements.

The hearsay rule is a fundamental principle in the law of evidence that generally excludes hearsay evidence from being admitted in court. The rationale behind the hearsay rule is as follows:
  1. Reliability: The rule against hearsay is based on concerns about the reliability and trustworthiness of second-hand information. When an out-of-court statement is made, the declarant is usually not subject to cross-examination, which means that the opposing party cannot question them to test the accuracy of their statement or their credibility as a witness.
  2. Lack of cross-examination: Cross-examination is a crucial element of the adversarial legal system, as it allows parties to challenge the evidence presented and probe the witnesses for inconsistencies, bias, or inaccuracies. Hearsay statements lack this critical safeguard, making it difficult for the court to assess their reliability.

For a statement to be considered hearsay, it must meet two key elements:
  1. Out-of-court statement: The statement must be made by the declarant outside the current court proceeding. This means the statement was not made while the declarant is testifying in the trial or hearing where the evidence is being offered.
  2. Offered for the truth of the matter asserted: The statement must be presented in court for the specific purpose of proving that the information contained in the statement is true. If the statement is being offered for any other purpose, it may not be hearsay.

Here are two examples to illustrate hearsay:
  1. Example 1: If a witness testifies in court that they heard someone else say, "The defendant was at the scene of the crime," and the purpose of offering this statement is to prove that the defendant was indeed present at the crime scene, then this would be hearsay evidence. The statement is being offered for its truth (i.e. to prove the defendant's presence), but the actual declarant (the person who made the statement) is not testifying and cannot be cross-examined.
  2. Example 2: Imagine a witness named John is testifying in a murder trial. John says, "I heard Susan say that she saw the defendant with the murder weapon on the night of the crime." Here, John's statement about what Susan said is hearsay because it is an out-of-court statement being offered in court to prove that the defendant had the murder weapon.

However, there are several exceptions to the hearsay rule that allow certain types of hearsay evidence to be admitted under specific circumstances. These exceptions are based on the belief that certain types of hearsay statements may carry sufficient reliability to warrant their admission. Some common exceptions include:
  1. Dying declarations: Statements made by a person who believes they are about to die and have no hope of recovery, relating to the cause or circumstances of their impending death.
  2. Excited utterances: Statements made under the influence of a startling event, which may make the declarant unable to fabricate or lie.
  3. Present sense impressions: Statements made while or immediately after a person perceives an event.
  4. Statements of mental, emotional, or physical state: Statements that describe a declarant's current state of mind, emotions, or physical condition.
  5. Business records: Certain business records made in the ordinary course of business.
  6. Prior testimony: Previous sworn testimony given by a witness in a different proceeding or deposition.

The admissibility of hearsay evidence and the specific exceptions can vary between jurisdictions and legal systems. The rules of evidence and the application of hearsay exceptions can be complex and require careful consideration in each case to determine whether certain hearsay evidence is admissible in court.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance Here

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.