Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1994]

Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1994] UKHL 5 is a landmark House of Lords case that established the possibility of concurrent liability in both tort and contract. The case involved Lloyd's of London, an insurance market organised in syndicates, where investors share business risks and rewards. Hurricanes in the United States resulted in significant losses for insurers, leading Lloyd's to call upon investors to cover their share of these losses. The litigation ensued, with names suing the underwriting agents for negligent management of the investment fund.

Mr Henderson, one of the names, sued Merrett Syndicates Ltd, one of the underwriting agents. The question at the heart of the case was whether the underwriting agents could be liable to the indirect investors, i.e. the names behind in the syndicate who had formed another syndicate. The contractual relationship existed between the head syndicate managers and their direct members, but not necessarily with the members of the sub-syndicate. This raised the issue of whether a duty could arise in tort, involving the matter of assumption of responsibility.

The House of Lords held that Merrett Syndicates was liable to both types of shareholders due to sufficient foreseeability, extending pure economic loss liability to un-proximate third parties. The significant aspect of the case was the allowance of claims in both contract and tort, blurring the traditional divide between the two. The House of Lords expressly overruled Lord Scarman's ruling in Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd [1986], which had stated that seeking liability in tort within a contractual relationship was not advantageous to the law's development.

Lord Goff, in his opinion, addressed the interpretation of the assumption of responsibility principle established in Hedley Byrne Co Ltd v Heller Partners Ltd [1964]. He disagreed with the notion that this principle was restricted to cases where there is no contract. He emphasised that the law of tort is the general law, and parties can contract within its framework. The assumption of responsibility may occur in a contractual context, and tortious liability should be attributed to it. Lord Goff advocated for the development of the assumption of responsibility principle to clarify that a tortious duty of care may arise not only in cases of gratuitous services but also when services are rendered under a contract.

Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd is significant for challenging the traditional separation between contract and tort, allowing concurrent claims in both. The case expanded the scope of liability and highlighted the importance of the assumption of responsibility in determining duty of care. Lord Goff's opinion underscored the interplay between contract and tort principles and advocated for the development of legal principles to adapt to changing circumstances.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.