Hobbes–Wallis Controversy
Share
The Hobbes-Wallis controversy was a significant intellectual dispute in the mid-17th century, involving two prominent English thinkers: Thomas Hobbes and John Wallis. The controversy revolved around issues related to mathematics, particularly the new developments in geometry, and had broader implications for philosophy and science.
Background: At the time, mathematics and philosophy were closely intertwined, and new mathematical developments had profound implications for various branches of philosophy, including metaphysics and ethics.
Geometry: The core of the controversy centred on the work of the French mathematician René Descartes and his development of analytic geometry. Descartes introduced the use of algebraic equations to study geometry, marking a significant departure from classical Greek geometry.
Hobbes's critique: Thomas Hobbes, a philosopher known for his work Leviathan, was critical of Descartes' mathematical innovations. Hobbes was a proponent of the classical Euclidean geometry, which relied on geometric proofs. He argued that Descartes' method was abstract and lacked the certainty of classical geometry.
Wallis's defence: John Wallis, a mathematician and cryptanalyst, defended Descartes' new methods. Wallis believed that algebraic geometry was a powerful tool for solving practical problems and that it had the potential to revolutionise various fields, including physics.
Philosophical implications: The debate extended to philosophy. Hobbes and Wallis debated not only the mathematical merits of these approaches but also their philosophical consequences. Hobbes believed that the new mathematical methods posed a challenge to the certainty of knowledge, while Wallis argued that they could enhance our understanding of the natural world.
Resolution: The controversy did not have a clear resolution, as it was part of a broader shift in the scientific and philosophical landscape. Ultimately, the new methods introduced by Descartes and defended by Wallis gained acceptance, and algebraic geometry became an integral part of modern mathematics.
The Hobbes-Wallis controversy is a reflection of the broader changes occurring in the 17th century, often referred to as the Scientific Revolution. This period witnessed significant shifts in scientific methods, the relationship between mathematics and the natural sciences, and the role of philosophy in shaping scientific inquiry. While the dispute was primarily about mathematics, it had implications for the evolving nature of scientific and philosophical inquiry in the modern era.
Background: At the time, mathematics and philosophy were closely intertwined, and new mathematical developments had profound implications for various branches of philosophy, including metaphysics and ethics.
Geometry: The core of the controversy centred on the work of the French mathematician René Descartes and his development of analytic geometry. Descartes introduced the use of algebraic equations to study geometry, marking a significant departure from classical Greek geometry.
Hobbes's critique: Thomas Hobbes, a philosopher known for his work Leviathan, was critical of Descartes' mathematical innovations. Hobbes was a proponent of the classical Euclidean geometry, which relied on geometric proofs. He argued that Descartes' method was abstract and lacked the certainty of classical geometry.
Wallis's defence: John Wallis, a mathematician and cryptanalyst, defended Descartes' new methods. Wallis believed that algebraic geometry was a powerful tool for solving practical problems and that it had the potential to revolutionise various fields, including physics.
Philosophical implications: The debate extended to philosophy. Hobbes and Wallis debated not only the mathematical merits of these approaches but also their philosophical consequences. Hobbes believed that the new mathematical methods posed a challenge to the certainty of knowledge, while Wallis argued that they could enhance our understanding of the natural world.
Resolution: The controversy did not have a clear resolution, as it was part of a broader shift in the scientific and philosophical landscape. Ultimately, the new methods introduced by Descartes and defended by Wallis gained acceptance, and algebraic geometry became an integral part of modern mathematics.
The Hobbes-Wallis controversy is a reflection of the broader changes occurring in the 17th century, often referred to as the Scientific Revolution. This period witnessed significant shifts in scientific methods, the relationship between mathematics and the natural sciences, and the role of philosophy in shaping scientific inquiry. While the dispute was primarily about mathematics, it had implications for the evolving nature of scientific and philosophical inquiry in the modern era.
