Invalidity of Trademark
Share
Invalidity of a trademark refers to the legal process through which the registration of a trademark is declared invalid or void. It means that the trademark registration is considered null and void from the outset, as if it never existed. The grounds for invalidity can vary depending on the applicable laws and regulations in each jurisdiction, but commonly recognised grounds include:
Lack of distinctiveness: A trademark may be deemed invalid if it lacks the necessary distinctiveness to identify and distinguish the goods or services of one company from those of others. Generic or descriptive terms that do not acquire secondary meaning or distinctiveness may face invalidity challenges.
Descriptiveness: If a trademark is purely descriptive of the goods or services it represents, it may be invalidated. Descriptive terms merely describe a characteristic, quality, or function of the goods or services and cannot be exclusively monopolised as a trademark.
Deceptiveness: A trademark that is deceptive or misleading to consumers may be subject to invalidation. If a mark falsely suggests a characteristic, origin, quality, or other important aspects of the goods or services, it can be challenged and declared invalid.
Prior rights: If a trademark conflicts with earlier existing rights, such as prior registered trademarks, it may be invalidated. If the use of the trademark would likely cause confusion, mistake, or deception among consumers, the earlier trademark owner may seek invalidation of the later mark.
Prohibited signs: Trademarks that consist of signs or symbols that are prohibited by law, such as offensive or immoral content, may be invalidated. Certain jurisdictions have specific regulations regarding the types of signs that can be registered as trademarks.
The process for invalidating a trademark typically involves filing an application or claim with the appropriate authority, such as the trademark office or a specialised tribunal. The party seeking invalidation must provide sufficient evidence and arguments to support his claim. The decision to invalidate a trademark is usually made by an administrative body or a court.
Lack of distinctiveness: A trademark may be deemed invalid if it lacks the necessary distinctiveness to identify and distinguish the goods or services of one company from those of others. Generic or descriptive terms that do not acquire secondary meaning or distinctiveness may face invalidity challenges.
Descriptiveness: If a trademark is purely descriptive of the goods or services it represents, it may be invalidated. Descriptive terms merely describe a characteristic, quality, or function of the goods or services and cannot be exclusively monopolised as a trademark.
Deceptiveness: A trademark that is deceptive or misleading to consumers may be subject to invalidation. If a mark falsely suggests a characteristic, origin, quality, or other important aspects of the goods or services, it can be challenged and declared invalid.
Prior rights: If a trademark conflicts with earlier existing rights, such as prior registered trademarks, it may be invalidated. If the use of the trademark would likely cause confusion, mistake, or deception among consumers, the earlier trademark owner may seek invalidation of the later mark.
Prohibited signs: Trademarks that consist of signs or symbols that are prohibited by law, such as offensive or immoral content, may be invalidated. Certain jurisdictions have specific regulations regarding the types of signs that can be registered as trademarks.
The process for invalidating a trademark typically involves filing an application or claim with the appropriate authority, such as the trademark office or a specialised tribunal. The party seeking invalidation must provide sufficient evidence and arguments to support his claim. The decision to invalidate a trademark is usually made by an administrative body or a court.
