Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2009]

Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2009] EWCA Civ 1312 addressed the elements required to establish the tort of false imprisonment. The court clarified that false imprisonment necessitates both a positive act by the defendant and the intention to deprive the claimant of their liberty.

The factual scenario involved prison guards participating in an unlawful strike organised by the Prison Officers Association. As a result, Iqbal, a prisoner, was confined to his cell throughout the day when he would typically have been allowed some hours of freedom. Iqbal brought a lawsuit against the Prison Officers Association for the tort of false imprisonment, and it was agreed that if the prison guards were liable, then the Prison Officers Association would also be liable.

The central issue in the case was whether negligent behaviour was sufficient to prove the intention required for false imprisonment. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the Prison Officers Association did not possess the requisite intention to deprive Iqbal of his liberty, and the prison officers had not taken direct positive steps to confine Iqbal to his cell. Furthermore, it was determined that the actions of the prison guards and the Prison Officers Association were not unlawful, thus precluding liability in tort.

Smith LJ, in her judgment, underscored that false imprisonment hinges on both a positive act by the Prison Officers Association and the intention to deprive Iqbal of their liberty. She clarified that a mere act of negligence, such as locking a door under the belief that the room is empty, does not constitute the necessary intention for false imprisonment. Subjective recklessness as to the consequences of conduct could satisfy the intention requirement in limited cases. Smith LJ emphasised that in the absence of a positive act, there could be no action for false imprisonment.

This case demonstrates that negligence is neither sufficient nor required to prove false imprisonment. It also highlights the importance of considering the lawful confinement of a prisoner and the bounds of legal authority in determining whether an act amounts to false imprisonment.

Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get fully prepared for SQE1 without breaking the bank. Access cost-effective SQE study manuals and 2000 practice questions developed by UOLLB, edited by lawyers, and published by UOL Press.

Turbocharge SQE Performance
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain access to over 2,200 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is approved by UOL School of Law and is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Join students and legal professionals from Legal 500 firms, top universities and international organisations who trust UOLLB

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Ministry of Defence
Baker Mckenzie
Linklaters
Atsumi & Sakai
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Arizona State University
McGill University
Toronto Metropolitan University
University of Hong Kong (HKU)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)
University of Buckingham
Robert Gordon University
ESSEC Business School
University of Puerto Rico

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Skills

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.