Isabella Shipowner SA v Shagang Shipping Co Ltd [2012]

Isabella Shipowner SA v Shagang Shipping Co Ltd [2012] EWHC 1077 (Comm) is a significant case in English contract law that addresses the circumstances under which an innocent party can legitimately affirm a repudiated contract. The central tenet established in this case is that an innocent party lacks a legitimate interest in affirming a repudiated contract when the contract breaker demonstrates that damages would be an adequate remedy, and affirmation would be wholly unreasonable.

The case involved charterers under a time charter who informed the ship owner of their intention to prematurely return the ship. The ship owner contested an arbitrator's decision that it could not refuse redelivery and was not entitled to affirm the charterparty.

The High Court overturned the arbitrator's decision, applying the criteria set out by Lord Reid in White and Carter. The court found that the ship owner was entitled to affirm the contract.

One crucial aspect considered was whether cooperation by the charterers was required for the ship owner to perform the time charter. It was established that, under a time charter, the owners have control over the master, crew, and fuel provisioning, and cooperation from the charterers is not essential. In contrast, a demise charter places more responsibilities on the charterer.

The test for the absence of a legitimate interest was outlined, requiring the contract breaker to show that damages are an adequate remedy and affirmation would be wholly unreasonable. Guidelines were provided, emphasising that the denial of the right to affirm occurs only in extreme cases, and the burden of proof lies with the contract breaker to demonstrate the absence of a legitimate interest.

The court held that the ship owner did have a legitimate interest in affirming the contract. Damages were deemed inadequate due to potential disputes on mitigation and the charterers' financial difficulties. Additionally, the burden imposed on the ship owner to find a new charterer in a challenging market was not considered wholly unreasonable.

The court criticised the arbitrator for failing to apply the correct test, considering the wrong facts, and placing the burden of proof on the ship owner. It clarified that the right to affirm a repudiated contract is the general principle, and the burden of proof rests on the contract breaker to establish the absence of a legitimate interest.

In summary, this case underscores the importance of legitimate interest in affirming a repudiated contract and provides guidance on the factors and burden of proof involved in such cases.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.