Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd [1975]
Share
Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 1468 is a notable English contract law case concerning the doctrine of privity of contract. The judgment delivered by Lord Denning MR shed light on the issues raised and the reasoning behind the decision.
Mr Jackson booked a holiday through Horizon Holidays Ltd for himself and his family at the Brown Beach Hotel in Ceylon (now Sri Lanka). Upon arrival, the facilities were substandard, not meeting the promised standards, leading to disappointment for Mr Jackson and his family. The room conditions were poor, lacking various amenities, and the cooking was unsatisfactory, causing discomfort and dissatisfaction. Mr Jackson sought damages for the disappointment and distress caused by the holiday.
Lord Denning MR's judgment established that Mr Jackson could recover damages for defective performance and mental distress on behalf of his family. Denning MR rejected the idea that the contract was made by all family members or that Mr Jackson was merely an agent for them. Instead, he emphasised that Mr Jackson was making a contract for the benefit of his family.
The judgment is noteworthy for challenging the strict privity rule and recognising the concept of making a contract for the benefit of a third party. However, it is also important to note that some aspects of Lord Denning MR's reasoning were later disapproved in Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980]. The latter case limited the application of Jackson to a confined category of cases involving consumers.
In conclusion, Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd contributes to the ongoing development of contract law, highlighting the challenges posed by the privity doctrine and the evolving legal principles related to third-party rights in contracts.
Mr Jackson booked a holiday through Horizon Holidays Ltd for himself and his family at the Brown Beach Hotel in Ceylon (now Sri Lanka). Upon arrival, the facilities were substandard, not meeting the promised standards, leading to disappointment for Mr Jackson and his family. The room conditions were poor, lacking various amenities, and the cooking was unsatisfactory, causing discomfort and dissatisfaction. Mr Jackson sought damages for the disappointment and distress caused by the holiday.
Lord Denning MR's judgment established that Mr Jackson could recover damages for defective performance and mental distress on behalf of his family. Denning MR rejected the idea that the contract was made by all family members or that Mr Jackson was merely an agent for them. Instead, he emphasised that Mr Jackson was making a contract for the benefit of his family.
The judgment is noteworthy for challenging the strict privity rule and recognising the concept of making a contract for the benefit of a third party. However, it is also important to note that some aspects of Lord Denning MR's reasoning were later disapproved in Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980]. The latter case limited the application of Jackson to a confined category of cases involving consumers.
In conclusion, Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd contributes to the ongoing development of contract law, highlighting the challenges posed by the privity doctrine and the evolving legal principles related to third-party rights in contracts.
