Jervis v Harris [1995]

Jervis v Harris [1995] EWCA Civ 9 is a notable case in landlord and tenant law that addresses important issues related to the enforcement of repairing covenants and the interpretation of specific clauses in long-term leases. The Court of Appeal established the principle that landlords can serve a notice on tenants to carry out repairs, and if the tenant fails to do so, the landlord may enter, carry out the works himself and recover the costs from the tenant as a debt. This ruling gave rise to what is known as the Jervis v Harris clause or self-help clause.

The case involved an underlease granted in 1947 for a term of 999 years, where the landlord sought to enforce certain covenants, particularly concerning the tenant's obligation to repair and maintain the property. At the heart of the dispute was the interpretation of Clause 2(7) of the lease, which imposed a dual obligation on the tenant to maintain the property in "good tenantable repair and condition" and, when necessary, to rebuild it to ensure that the property would always be capable of commanding a minimum letting value of £1,000 per annum.

The Court of Appeal had to determine whether the tenant's obligation to repair the property was qualified by the requirement to ensure a letting value of £1,000 per annum, as stipulated in the clause. The tenant argued that his duty to repair was limited by the property's lettable value, while the landlord maintained that the two obligations, which were repair and rebuild, were distinct and should not be conflated. The court, agreeing with the trial judge, ruled that the requirement to achieve a letting value of £1,000 per annum only applied to the obligation to rebuild, not to the obligation to repair. The tenant was therefore required to maintain the property in good tenantable repair irrespective of the letting value.

Another key issue in the case was the applicability of the Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938, specifically whether the landlord's right to enter the property to carry out repairs and seek reimbursement from the tenant was subject to the restrictions of the Act. The 1938 Act was designed to protect tenants from harsh enforcement of repairing covenants, particularly in long leases. The court had to consider whether the landlord's right to recover the costs of repairs carried out under Clause 2(10) of the lease constituted a claim for damages, which would require the landlord to seek court approval under the Act. The Court of Appeal held that the landlord's right to reimbursement did not amount to a claim for damages, but was rather a debt owed by the tenant. Therefore, the landlord was not required to obtain the court's leave before enforcing the covenant.

Lastly, the case touched on the question of whether the tenant's liability to reimburse the landlord for repair costs amounted to a penalty. The tenant argued that the clause was punitive in nature and therefore unenforceable. The court rejected this argument, holding that the landlord's right to recover repair costs was not a penalty, but a standard contractual provision for ensuring the property was properly maintained. The decision reaffirmed the long-established principle that such covenants, common in long leases, were not intended to penalise tenants but to ensure the upkeep of the property for the benefit of both parties.

In conclusion, Jervis v Harris clarified key aspects of landlord and tenant law, particularly in relation to long leases and the enforcement of repairing covenants. The case established that landlords could enforce repair obligations without being constrained by the Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938, provided their claim was for reimbursement and not damages. It also confirmed that tenants must maintain properties in good repair, independent of any stipulations regarding the property's letting value. This case remains a significant precedent in disputes over lease obligations in the UK.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.