Joint Enterprise

Joint enterprise, also known as common purpose parasitic accessory liability, is a legal doctrine that allows individuals who participate in a criminal enterprise to be held criminally liable for the acts committed by others in the group, even if they did not directly commit the offence themselves.

Elements: To establish joint enterprise, the prosecution must prove the three elements: (a) agreement or common purpose where there must be evidence that the defendant agreed with others to commit a specific crime or that they shared a common purpose to engage in criminal conduct, (b) foreseeability of co-defendant’s actions where the defendant must have foreseen that one or more of their co-defendants might commit a criminal offence while carrying out the common purpose, and (c) participation where the defendant must have actively participated in the joint enterprise or assisted in the commission of the offence in some significant way.

Application: Joint enterprise can be applied to a wide range of offences, from minor offences to serious crimes such as murder. In murder cases, joint enterprise has been particularly controversial and subject to criticism due to concerns that it may lead to wrongful convictions of individuals who did not directly cause the death.

Consequences: Under joint enterprise, each participant in the criminal activity can be held criminally liable for the actions of the others if they intended to commit the crime or foresaw the possibility of the crime being committed and went on to participate in it anyway. This means that a person who did not directly commit the criminal act, but was present and participated in the crime, can be convicted of the same offence as the person who actually committed the act.

Example: For example, in a situation where a group of people plan and carry out a robbery, and one of them uses a weapon and seriously injures someone during the robbery, all members of the group may be charged with the same offence of robbery and also with causing grievous bodily harm with intent.

In 2016, the UK Supreme Court clarified the law on joint enterprise in the case of R v Jogee (Ameen Hassan), ruling that the doctrine had been misinterpreted in earlier cases. The court held that the mere presence or association with someone who commits a crime is not enough to establish joint enterprise liability. The court emphasised the importance of individual culpability and the need to show that the defendant actively participated in or assist or encouraged the criminal act. The prosecution must prove the actus reus that the person assisted or encouraged the other party to commit the crime and also the mens rea that he had the same intent as the other party to commit that crime.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.