Kelner v Baxter [1866]

Kelner v Baxter (1866) LR 2 CP 174 is a foundational case in UK company law, particularly regarding the issue of pre-incorporation contracts. It deals with the legal implications when promoters, acting on behalf of a company that has not yet been formed, enter into contracts in anticipation of the company's incorporation. The key question in this case was whether the promoters, who signed a contract on behalf of a company that did not yet exist, could be held personally liable for the obligations under that contract.

In this case, a group of promoters for a hotel business entered into a contract to purchase wine before the company had been legally registered. After the company's incorporation, the contract was ratified by the newly formed entity. Unfortunately, the wine was consumed, and the company soon went into liquidation without paying for it. The promoters were subsequently sued by the wine supplier, as the company was insolvent. The promoters argued that once the company ratified the contract, any liability for payment had passed to the company, thereby relieving them of personal responsibility.

The court, however, disagreed. Chief Justice Erle ruled that since the company did not exist at the time the contract was made, the agreement could not be binding on the non-existent company. As a result, the promoters were personally liable for the contract. The reasoning was that a contract made before a company’s incorporation cannot be ratified retrospectively because the company had no legal existence at the time. Therefore, a third party cannot release the promoters from liability through ratification alone.

The case also clarifies that promoters can avoid personal liability in certain situations. For example, if after incorporation, the company and the third party substitute the original pre-incorporation contract with a new agreement on the same or similar terms, this process, known as novation, can transfer liability to the company. Additionally, if the promoter signs the contract merely to confirm the signature of the company, and not as a principal or agent, there may be no personal liability, as the contract would be deemed a nullity in the absence of the company.

Kelner v Baxter sets an important precedent in company law, confirming that promoters cannot escape liability for contracts made on behalf of non-existent companies unless a novation occurs or another mechanism is used to transfer responsibility. It highlights the risks faced by promoters and emphasises the need for caution when entering into agreements before a company's formal registration.

Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get fully prepared for SQE1 without breaking the bank. Access cost-effective SQE study manuals and 2000 practice questions developed by UOLLB, edited by lawyers, and published by UOL Press.

Turbocharge SQE Performance
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain access to over 2,200 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is approved by UOL School of Law and is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Join students and legal professionals from Legal 500 firms, top universities and international organisations who trust UOLLB

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Ministry of Defence
Baker Mckenzie
Linklaters
Atsumi & Sakai
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Arizona State University
McGill University
Toronto Metropolitan University
University of Hong Kong (HKU)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)
University of Buckingham
Robert Gordon University
ESSEC Business School
University of Puerto Rico

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Skills

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.