Kent v Griffiths [2000]

Kent v Griffiths [2000] 2 All ER 474 is a landmark decision in English tort law, particularly concerning the duty of care owed by emergency services, such as ambulance services. This case is significant because it represents an exception to the general rule that emergency services do not owe a duty of care to individuals in certain circumstances. The Court of Appeal's ruling in this case addressed the extent of liability for emergency services when their response times are inadequate and have direct consequences on the health and safety of individuals in critical situations.

The claimant, Mrs Kent, brought a claim in negligence against the London Ambulance Service (LAS) after an ambulance, which had been dispatched in response to a 999 call made by her doctor, took forty minutes to arrive. Mrs Kent was suffering from a severe asthma attack, and by the time the ambulance arrived, she had suffered a respiratory arrest. The issue before the court was whether the LAS owed a duty of care to Mrs Kent, given that emergency services generally do not owe a duty of care to individuals relying on their services, as established in previous cases involving police, fire brigades, and coastguards.

In the first instance, the court found in favour of Mrs Kent, and the LAS appealed the decision. The Court of Appeal upheld the lower court's judgment, establishing that the LAS did indeed owe a duty of care to Mrs Kent. The court reasoned that it was reasonably foreseeable that a delay in ambulance response would worsen Mrs Kent’s condition. The Court of Appeal found that once the LAS accepted the emergency call and dispatched an ambulance, a specific duty of care arose, which required the ambulance service to respond within a reasonable time. The court determined that there was no valid public policy reason to exclude the duty of care in this specific context.

Lord Woolf, delivering the leading judgment, distinguished this case from others involving emergency services. He emphasised that while police and fire brigades are generally not liable for failure to respond to calls, ambulance services are part of the health service and have a specific duty to the patients they are dispatched to assist. He noted that the ambulance service’s role was focused on providing care at the scene rather than managing broader public safety concerns, which differentiated it from other emergency services.

In his judgment, Lord Woolf also commented that an ambulance service would not typically be held liable for negligence in cases where they refuse to respond to a 999 call, though such refusal could potentially breach statutory duties. He noted that the burden of proving causation in emergency situations would generally protect ambulance services from liability, except where their conduct was demonstrably deficient.

The ruling in Kent v Griffiths is significant because it establishes an exception to the general rule that emergency services do not owe a duty of care to individuals. The case underscores that, in situations where an ambulance service’s inadequate response exacerbates the claimant’s condition, a duty of care can exist. The decision crystallises the statutory power of ambulance services to respond to emergency calls into a specific duty to address individual calls with reasonable promptness. This case thus highlights the balance between protecting emergency services from excessive liability and ensuring that they fulfil their duty to provide timely assistance in critical situations.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.